Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:07:25 -0800 Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > > On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Hans Wennborg wrote: > >> I'd like to avoid 4.1 because of the

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On 5 December 2016 at 20:07, Hans Wennborg wrote: > I'm worried that users will, with some reason, think that the 4.1 and > 5.1 releases are the same kind as 2.1 and 3.1 :-/ IMO, this is too small of a worry to encumber us for the rest of our release days with silly zeroes.

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Hans Wennborg wrote: >> I'd like to avoid 4.1 because of the potential for confusion about >> whether it's a major release (as it would have been under the old >>

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Hans Wennborg wrote: > I'd like to avoid 4.1 because of the potential for confusion about > whether it's a major release (as it would have been under the old > scheme) or a patch release. But if the versioning scheme is different, users will have

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 5 December 2016 at 18:56, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers > wrote: >> The idea is that Tom's stable releases will keep incrementing the >> "patch" part of the version numbers,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On 5 December 2016 at 18:56, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > The idea is that Tom's stable releases will keep incrementing the > "patch" part of the version numbers, just as today, so they would be > 4.0.1, 4.0.2, etc. Hum, this looks weird. I was under

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On 5 December 2016 at 18:42, Dimitry Andric via Release-testers wrote: > Maybe I didn't pay enough attention, but where is the general outline > for this versioning scheme documented? And are we still going to do > 4.1, 4.2, etc? This is the thread: