Re: [lldb-dev] Green Dragon LLDB Xcode build update: TSAN support

2016-04-06 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
On 6 April 2016 at 06:23, Todd Fiala wrote: > Okay, thanks all. > > FWIW I am running them on the OS X side. I haven't seen any stability > problems yet. I'd also expect them to be very stable, much more like a > compiler test, since there are far fewer parts in a

Re: [lldb-dev] Green Dragon LLDB Xcode build update: TSAN support

2016-04-05 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
We're not running them yet. I'd like to add that at some point, but I haven't gotten around to that yet... On 5 April 2016 at 09:39, Tamas Berghammer wrote: > I think we don't. If we consider them stable enough for enabling them on a > buildbot AND we agree to revert

Re: [lldb-dev] Green Dragon LLDB Xcode build update: TSAN support

2016-04-05 Thread Tamas Berghammer via lldb-dev
I think we don't. If we consider them stable enough for enabling them on a buildbot AND we agree to revert changes breaking the unittests then I am happy with enabling them (doing it should take very little effort from our side). Otherwise I would prefer to wait until we can get them to a stable

Re: [lldb-dev] Green Dragon LLDB Xcode build update: TSAN support

2016-04-04 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
One more update: The Green Dragon OS X LLDB builder now actually runs the gtests instead of just building them. The gtests run as a phase right before the Python test suite. A non-zero value returning from the gtests will cause the OS X LLDB build to fail. Right now, tracking down the cause of

[lldb-dev] Green Dragon LLDB Xcode build update: TSAN support

2016-04-04 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hi all, I've made a minor change to the Green Dragon LLDB OS X Xcode build located here: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/LLDB/ 1. Previously, the python test run used the default C/C++ compiler to build test inferiors. Now it uses the just-built clang/clang++ to build test inferiors. At