Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged

2017-08-28 Thread Dimitry Andric via lldb-dev
On 26 Aug 2017, at 00:52, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 5.0.0-rc3 was just tagged. > > This is a release candidate in the real sense: if nothing bad comes up > in testing, this is what the release is going to look like. Built and tested, no

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged

2017-08-26 Thread Simon Dardis via lldb-dev
Yes, the removal of RISC-V from LLVM_ALL_TARGETS was intentional. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D36538 and the accompanying message to llvm-dev: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-August/116347.html for the rationale. Thanks, Simon From:

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged

2017-08-26 Thread Bero Rosenkränzer via lldb-dev
Working well here so far. Is the removal of the RISCVCodeGen, RISCVDesc and RISCVInfo libraries that were in rc2 intentional? ttyl bero On 26 August 2017 at 00:52, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > Dear testers, > > 5.0.0-rc3 was just tagged. > > This is