thanks for workaround
2016-01-11 21:48 GMT+03:00 Zachary Turner :
> Yea, unfortunately the way things work is that the person who is affected
> by the problem and who needs it fixed is usually the one that needs to fix
> it. Right now we don't have any Windows people building inside Visual
> Stu
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Greg Clayton wrote:
> If you think any such bindings should be included by default, please file a
> bug and suggest what you think should be added by default. If you do add
> something you should think if the binding should be for vi or emacs bindings
> by defau
So anything that is missing can be added to your ~/.editrc file since LLDB uses
the editline library and that reads .editrc file.
Examples of what you can add to your .editrc file:
lldb:bind '^[[5C' vi-next-word
lldb:bind '^[[5D' vi-prev-word
lldb:bind '^D' ed-delete-next-char
lldb:bind '^B' ed-
On OS X Ctrl left & right arrow are taken over by the system to move between
virtual desktops. Instead, option left & right are the equivalent gesture for
move by word on OS X, and in the OS X lldb, option left & right do indeed move
by word.
LLDB doesn't do most of this stuff by hand, it lets
Yea, unfortunately the way things work is that the person who is affected
by the problem and who needs it fixed is usually the one that needs to fix
it. Right now we don't have any Windows people building inside Visual
Studio, so nobody has fixed that. But you're welcome to submit a patch :)
FWI
thanks. i build successefuly llvm and lldb with ninja and cl compiler.
If i build VS solution without options on CMake then i have ever more
errors around unittests in llvm.
like that:
"d:\code\llvm\build\LLVM.sln" (целевой объект по умолчанию) (1) ->
"d:\code\llvm\build\unittests\ADT\ADTTests.v
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25921
lab...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
>> Is it a feature that would be welcome?
> Is this an offer to implement the feature? ;)
> If so, I know a couple of people, who would be very pleased by that. :)
I'm willing to implement it (or at least try :P), but first I wanted to
gauge i
LLDB's command line editing leaves a lot to be desired. The thing
which annoys me the most is that you get bogus characters inserted if
you press the wrong character (e.g. left arrow) in the incremental
search (^R) mode.
> Is it a feature that would be welcome?
Is this an offer to implement the fe
Also including the list...
On 11 January 2016 at 09:30, Pavel Labath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there was a race condition in 3.7, which sometimes caused a hang
> during process attach. This should be fixed in r246756, but this fix
> is not available in the 3.7 branch. I think if you try this with the
> c
Reminder: the deadline for submitting papers for the EuroLLVM 2016 in
Barcelona is in 2 weeks.
Kind regards,
--
Arnaud A. de Grandmaison
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison <
arnaud.ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the 6th European LLVM conference o
11 matches
Mail list logo
