Re: [lldb-dev] lldb status at windows

2016-01-22 Thread Nico Weber via lldb-dev
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Under llvm/tools also checkout lld. So your directories should look like > this: > > llvm > \-- tools > \-- clang > \-- lldb > \-- lld > > Then re-run cmake to generate build files again,

Re: [lldb-dev] clang-format now supports return type on separate line

2016-01-22 Thread Sean Callanan via lldb-dev
Wow, that’s a super handy feature and probably goes a long way toward alleviating concerns about tables. I have to say, I always feel good vibes about a source base when they have lint directives in comments. Shows they run lint as a matter of course. Sean > On Jan 22, 2016, at 12:29 PM,

Re: [lldb-dev] clang-format now supports return type on separate line

2016-01-22 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
Oh neat, I didn't know about that. I'll play around with that when I have some time and see how the behavior works with respect to git clang-format (which formats diffs instead of entire files) On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:29 PM Pavel Labath wrote: > Apparently, you can also

Re: [lldb-dev] clang-format now supports return type on separate line

2016-01-22 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
Apparently, you can also disable the formatting of a piece of code by a magic comment. Could be quite useful for those tables. From the docs: - Clang-format understands also special comments that switch formatting in a delimited range. The code between a comment // clang-format off or /*

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb status at windows

2016-01-22 Thread Red Skotina via lldb-dev
Look like I miss something , but i cant debug simple program program compiled with clang from trunk (258016), msvc 2015 stdlib, from vs2015 x86 developer console . i use lldb from trunk #include "stdio.h" int main(int argc, char **argv) { printf("hello1\n");

[lldb-dev] Ubuntu version-based fail/skip

2016-01-22 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hey all, What do you think about having some kind of way of marking the (in this case, specifically) Ubuntu distribution for fail/skip test decorators? I've had a few cases where I've needed to mark tests failing on for Ubuntu where it really was only a particular release of an Ubuntu

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb status at windows

2016-01-22 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
When you compile, you need to use -fuse-ld=lld. Most people miss this step. That said, it's not supposed to hang, but it is supposed to not work. What's the command line you used with clang? On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:08 AM Red Skotina wrote: > Look like I miss

Re: [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] Schedule and call for testers

2016-01-22 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > It's not quite time to start the 3.8 release process, but it's time to > start planning. > > Please let me know if you want to help with testing and building > release binaries for your favourite platform. (If you were a

Re: [lldb-dev] CFP for the 6th European LLVM conference on March 17-18, 2016 in Barcelona, Spain

2016-01-22 Thread Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison via lldb-dev
Reminder: the deadline for submitting papers for the EuroLLVM is Monday. Kind regards, -- Arnaud On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison < arnaud.ad...@gmail.com> wrote: > We are pleased to announce the 6th European LLVM conference on March > 17-18, 2016 in Barcelona,

[lldb-dev] [Bug 26261] New: gtest failure in PythonDataObjectsTest.TestPythonBytes on OS X 10.11

2016-01-22 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26261 Bug ID: 26261 Summary: gtest failure in PythonDataObjectsTest.TestPythonBytes on OS X 10.11 Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: Macintosh OS: MacOS X

[lldb-dev] [Bug 26265] New: [Windows] Evaluating arguments gives incorrect values except for frame 0

2016-01-22 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26265 Bug ID: 26265 Summary: [Windows] Evaluating arguments gives incorrect values except for frame 0 Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT

[lldb-dev] LLDB OS X buildbot/testbot details

2016-01-22 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hi all, The llvm.org Green Dragon (i.e. Jenkins-based) LLDB OS X buildbot/testbot has received some improvements today. The Jenkins build now uses the xUnit plugin to process xUnit-based test suite results, which are displayed more usefully on the "build and test" page here

Re: [lldb-dev] clang-format now supports return type on separate line

2016-01-22 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Okay, thanks for the tip! On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > By the way, one place where you are guaranteed to get undesirable results > is where you have a large array formatted so that the columns line up. > Like in our options tables in the

Re: [lldb-dev] clang-format now supports return type on separate line

2016-01-22 Thread Kate Stone via lldb-dev
Agreed. My guidance has been that we go ahead and require submitters to use clang-format for patches, but to acknowledge that there may be cases where this produces undesirable results. Manual formatting to correct these issues is acceptable and should lead to discussions about concrete

Re: [lldb-dev] clang-format now supports return type on separate line

2016-01-22 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
By the way, one place where you are guaranteed to get undesirable results is where you have a large array formatted so that the columns line up. Like in our options tables in the CommandObjects. If you're using git, one way to avoid having clang-format touch these files is to commit that file by

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB test questions

2016-01-22 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hi Ted! I hope you don't mind - I'm going to CC lldb-dev since there is some useful general info in here for others who are getting started with the test system. (And others can fact-check anything I may gloss over here). On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Ted Woodward