[lldb-dev] [EuroLLVM] Early bird registration deadline: Feb 3rd

2016-02-01 Thread Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison via lldb-dev
Just a quick reminder: the early bird registration deadline for the EuroLLVM 2016 is Feb 3rd. Registration at: https://intranet.pacifico-meetings.com/GesCoForm/?cfg=887 More info about EuroLLVM 2016 at: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2016-03/ Kind regards, -- Arnaud

Re: [lldb-dev] Understanding debugger launch events sequence

2016-02-01 Thread via lldb-dev
Great, thanks for the confirmation. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2016, at 1:32 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > >> On 29 January 2016 at 18:43, Jeffrey Tan wrote: >> Thanks Jim. Is this true for other platforms? Our IDE is going to support >> Mac and

[lldb-dev] [Bug 26421] New: CommandObjectRegister should set status eReturnStatusSuccessFinishResult

2016-02-01 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26421 Bug ID: 26421 Summary: CommandObjectRegister should set status eReturnStatusSuccessFinishResult Product: lldb Version: 3.8 Hardware: All OS: All

Re: [lldb-dev] How to get SBTarget before AttachToProcessWithID?

2016-02-01 Thread Jeffrey Tan via lldb-dev
Thanks guys, will give empty target a try. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Jim Ingham wrote: > Often when attaching, you know the executable you are planning to attach > to. So the "normal" workflow is to create a target, then attach to the > process with that target's

[lldb-dev] February LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday!

2016-02-01 Thread Chandler Carruth via lldb-dev
(actually spelling lldb-dev correctly, sorry for the typo) We'll be at Tied House as usual, starting on Thursday the 4th at 7pm! If you can, help us plan and RSVP here: http://meetu.ps/2RN2C5 See everyone there! -Chandler ___ lldb-dev mailing list

Re: [lldb-dev] Patch to fix REPL for ARMv7 & ARMv6 on linux

2016-02-01 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
On 30 January 2016 at 00:13, William Dillon wrote: > In a very real sense, no information is lost here. That is exactly the reason why it looks very hackish. :) It looks to me like you are trying to work around some other bug, probably in the code that consumes the

Re: [lldb-dev] Understanding debugger launch events sequence

2016-02-01 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
On 29 January 2016 at 18:43, Jeffrey Tan wrote: > Thanks Jim. Is this true for other platforms? Our IDE is going to support > Mac and Linux and may extend to Windows some time later. AFAIK, windows spawns a separate thread to do the actual debugging, but this is hidden

Re: [lldb-dev] Inquiry for performance monitors

2016-02-01 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
Speaking for Android Studio, I think that we *could* use a python-based implementation (hard to say exactly without knowing the details of the implementation), but I believe a different implementation could be *easier* to integrate. Plus, if the solution integrates more closely with lldb, we could

Re: [lldb-dev] Inquiry for performance monitors

2016-02-01 Thread Tamas Berghammer via lldb-dev
If you want to go with the path to implement it outside LLDB then I would suggest to implement it with an out of tree plugin written in C++. You can use the SB API the same way as you can from python and additionally it have a few advantages: * You have a C/C++ API what makes it easy to integrate

Re: [lldb-dev] How to get SBTarget before AttachToProcessWithID?

2016-02-01 Thread Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
Often when attaching, you know the executable you are planning to attach to. So the "normal" workflow is to create a target, then attach to the process with that target's executable. This is particularly useful for remote debugging, since having a local copy of the binary will mean less data