Windows LLDB is done
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:39 AM Daniel Sanders via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> All the MIPS buildbots are ready too.
>
>
>
> *From:* llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] *On Behalf Of
> *NAKAMURA
> Takumi via llvm-dev
> *Sent:* 25 May 2016 23:03
That's good news. We probably have some reserves left in there due to
the scheduling of tests of different size.
On 26 May 2016 at 16:30, Todd Fiala wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> FYI -
>
> I took a look at the ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 cmake buildbot before and after the
> -gmodules change landed, and it look
Hi Pavel,
FYI -
I took a look at the ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 cmake buildbot before and after
the -gmodules change landed, and it looks like the total runtime is up
about 12%. (Now ~28 minutes, before ~25 minutes).
Doesn't seem too bad for the scope of increased coverage.
--
-Todd
All the MIPS buildbots are ready too.
From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of NAKAMURA
Takumi via llvm-dev
Sent: 25 May 2016 23:03
To: Chris Bieneman; llvm-...@lists.llvm.org; cfe-...@lists.llvm.org;
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [Attn: Bot Owners!]
Thanks hugely for those very useful pointers (groan...)
It seems that embedding address space info in the high-order bits of the
common address is the common hack around the problem and likely to remain
so in the near term (at least I didn't see anything in the mail threads
suggesting an implement
