On 13 April 2017 at 07:28, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
wrote:
> Improving the checksumming speed is definitely a worthwhile contribution,
> but be aware that there is a pretty simple way to avoid computing the crc
> altogether, and that is to make sure your binaries have a build ID. This is
> genera
Hello,
I've prepared two sets of core(5) files with the following programs:
- 1lwp_SIGSEGV (signal SIGSEGV emitted for thread)
- 1lwp_busyloop (signal SIGABRT emitted for the whole process)
My compiler is GCC 5.4.0 and host NetBSD/amd64 7.99.70.
The first set is written with a custom startup a
Never mind. The option doesn't work the way desired. I'll follow up with
Eric about other ideas to reduce spam.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:51 PM Chandler Carruth
wrote:
> Hoping this will at least reduce the spam starting to show up. Let me or
> Eric know if you hit any issues with this (we've no
Hoping this will at least reduce the spam starting to show up. Let me or
Eric know if you hit any issues with this (we've not tried it before).
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
