Re: [lldb-dev] Unreliable process attach on Linux

2019-01-05 Thread Florian Weimer via lldb-dev
* Zachary Turner: > I'd be curious to see if the PID of the process that is failed to > attach to is the same as one of the PIDs of a process that was > previously attached to (and if so, if it is the first such case where > a PID is recycled). I added logging of the PID, and got this (the

Re: [lldb-dev] Unreliable process attach on Linux

2019-01-05 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
I'd be curious to see if the PID of the process that is failed to attach to is the same as one of the PIDs of a process that was previously attached to (and if so, if it is the first such case where a PID is recycled). On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 4:42 AM Florian Weimer via lldb-dev <

Re: [lldb-dev] Unreliable process attach on Linux

2019-01-05 Thread Jan Kratochvil via lldb-dev
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:38:42 +0100, Florian Weimer via lldb-dev wrote: > Run it in a loop like this: > > $ while ./test-attach ; do date; done > > On Linux x86-64 (Fedora 29), with LLDB 7 (lldb-7.0.0-1.fc29.x86_64) and > kernel 4.19.12 (kernel-4.19.12-301.fc29.x86_64), after 100 iterations or >