On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:38 PM Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
I haven't followed how this worked out for GCC, but I worry that if we > go from 3.9.0 to 4.0 with the intention of doing 5.0 next, users will > get confused when we ship 4.1 as a "dot" release instead of a major > release like we've used to. > GCC does one major release a year. That release gets a new major number. Subsequent releases during that year get a minor number ( https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline) Diego.
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
