Hey Jonas that looks great! And what a nice way to do the review.
Two of the pages from "RESOURCES" are in the new docs now: Testing LLDB and The
SB API Coding Rules
Will they be removed from the root page and/or do the others follow?
Added a few notes on escape characters to the review.
> The
For those interested, I've uploaded the latest version of the generated
HTML:
https://jonasdevlieghere.com/static/lldb/
I'd have to double check but I think that almost everything was ported
over. The biggest issue is that the GDB to LLDB command map is totally
unreadable with the RST generated
Hi Jonas, I think this is a great effort. Thanks!
My current reviews do some small updates on the build page. Hope this doesn't
get in conflict with your work?
Best
Stefan
> On 6. Dec 2018, at 18:02, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The current LLDB website is
> On Dec 7, 2018, at 4:37 AM, Bruce Mitchener via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 6:11 PM Raphael Isemann via lldb-dev
>> wrote:
>> I think if we want to actually lower the entry barrier for
>> contributing/fixing things on the website, then the server should do
>> this. From
I think if we want to actually lower the entry barrier for
contributing/fixing things on the website, then the server should do
this. From what I know the other LLVM projects also generate the HTML
on the server (at least I've never seen anyone commit generated HTML
files), so this hopefully
On 06/12/2018 18:02, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev wrote:
Hi everyone,
The current LLDB website is written in HTML which is hard to maintain.
We have quite a bit of HTML code checked in which can make it hard to
differentiate between documentation written by us and documentation
generated
I like this a lot!
I commented on the patch since I didn't see this thread at the time, but
it'd be interesting to perhaps replace Epydoc with Sphinx as well.
- Bruce
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:02 AM Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The
Hi everyone,
The current LLDB website is written in HTML which is hard to maintain. We have
quite a bit of HTML code checked in which can make it hard to differentiate
between documentation written by us and documentation generated by a tool.
Furthermore I think text/RST files provide a lower
