Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-25 Thread Tatyana Krasnukha via lldb-dev
: Alexander Polyakov ; LLDB Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin What's triggering one of the OS Plugin methods to get run on this separate thread? I would expect SetPrivateState would just cause the private stop event to get broadcast to the private state

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-21 Thread Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
t was an inappropriate approach. > > -Original Message- > From: jing...@apple.com > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 11:58 PM > To: Tatyana Krasnukha > Cc: Alexander Polyakov ; LLDB > > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plug

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-21 Thread Tatyana Krasnukha via lldb-dev
were a public stop". Cleaning that up is item 5 on the lldb Projects page if anyone is interested... Jim > > From: lldb-dev On Behalf Of > Alexander Polyakov via lldb-dev > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 9:54 PM > To: Jim Ingham > Cc: LLDB > Subject: Re: [lldb-

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-21 Thread Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
e lldb Projects page if anyone is interested... Jim > > From: lldb-dev On Behalf Of Alexander > Polyakov via lldb-dev > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 9:54 PM > To: Jim Ingham > Cc: LLDB > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugi

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-21 Thread Tatyana Krasnukha via lldb-dev
il one comes (correct me if I’m wrong about that). From: lldb-dev On Behalf Of Alexander Polyakov via lldb-dev Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 9:54 PM To: Jim Ingham Cc: LLDB Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin It seems that the process plugi

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-21 Thread Alexander Polyakov via lldb-dev
It seems that the process plugin uses the Process::SetPrivateState at the right time. If you look at the log, you will see that the process is already in the '*private* *stopped'* state when the OS plugin is invoked. (lldb) c lldb Process::Resume -- locking run lock lldb

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-14 Thread Alexander Polyakov via lldb-dev
I found out that the plugin works well with an x86 application, so I think that the problem is in my process plugin. Maybe you know a place where to start looking for an issue? On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:56 PM Jim Ingham wrote: > The simplest thing possible to reproduce the failure. So some

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-14 Thread Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
The simplest thing possible to reproduce the failure. So some OS_Plugin implementation which tries to look up a global like this and fails, and some program source I can run it under that provides said global. That way I can easily watch it fails as you describe when the plugin gets

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-14 Thread Alexander Polyakov via lldb-dev
Sure, could you describe in more detail which example may help you? чт, 14 февр. 2019 г. в 22:36, Jim Ingham : > That’s a little complicated… > > lldb has two levels of stop state - private stops and public stops. When > the process gets notification from the underlying process plugin that the

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-14 Thread Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
That’s a little complicated… lldb has two levels of stop state - private stops and public stops. When the process gets notification from the underlying process plugin that the process stopped, it raises a private stop event. That gets handled by the ShouldStop mechanism on the private

Re: [lldb-dev] SB API is not working properly with OSPython plugin

2019-02-14 Thread Alexander Polyakov via lldb-dev
It is, the error is: *error: error: process must be stopped.* I thought that the plugin (get_thread_info in my case) is invoked when the process is already stopped, but it's not. Is it ok? On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 9:53 PM Jim Ingham wrote: > All SBValues have an error in them