On 21/03/2019 13:12, David Chisnall via lldb-dev wrote:
On 20 Mar 2019, at 18:23, Arthur O'Dwyer via cfe-dev
wrote:
Server-side hooks are the answer to this problem. There is no problem. You just
use a server-side hook.
It is quite unlikely that GitHub will allow LLVM (or any other
On 20 Mar 2019, at 18:23, Arthur O'Dwyer via cfe-dev
wrote:
>
> Server-side hooks are the answer to this problem. There is no problem. You
> just use a server-side hook.
It is quite unlikely that GitHub will allow LLVM (or any other project) to run
arbitrary post-receive hooks. It is far
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:00 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev <
cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to follow up on the previous thread[1], where there was a
> consensus
> to disallow merge commits in the llvm github repository, and start a
> discussion
> about how we should enforce
On 03/20/2019 11:38 AM, Zachary Turner wrote:
> It sounds like we need to get someone from the Foundation (chandlerc@,
> lattner@, tanya@, someone else?) to reach out to them offline about this.
>
Yes, we will try to reach out to GitHub directly about this, but I still
think we need some kind
It sounds like we need to get someone from the Foundation (chandlerc@,
lattner@, tanya@, someone else?) to reach out to them offline about this.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:23 AM Arthur O'Dwyer
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:19 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev <
> cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
Then we should not accept it. What if someone did the same on a phabricator
review?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:39 AM Anton Korobeynikov
wrote:
> > Github PRs are how everyone who is not already super-involved in the
> llvm project is going to want to contribute changes, and we ought to be as
>
> Github PRs are how everyone who is not already super-involved in the llvm
> project is going to want to contribute changes, and we ought to be as
> welcoming as possible to such users.
Still we'd need some policy & checks here. Say, what if someone will
issue a PR to LLVM 4.0 branch? With
Honestly I'm looking forward to GitHub's interface here.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019, 1:25 PM James Y Knight via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I think we definitely will want to support github PRs, at the very least
> as an _option_, even if we continue running/preferring phabricator.
>
I think we definitely will want to support github PRs, at the very least as
an _option_, even if we continue running/preferring phabricator.
Github PRs are how everyone who is not already super-involved in the llvm
project is going to want to contribute changes, and we ought to be as
welcoming as
