Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers

> -Original Message- > From: hwennb...@google.com [mailto:hwennb...@google.com] On Behalf Of Hans > Wennborg > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:27 AM > To: Robinson, Paul > Cc: Rafael Espíndola; Tom Stellard; llvm-...@lists.llvm.org; Release- > testers; cfe-dev; openmp-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Robinson, Paul via cfe-dev wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of >> Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev >> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 7:47 AM >> To: Tom Stellard >> Cc:

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers

> -Original Message- > From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Tom > Stellard via cfe-dev > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 7:12 AM > To: Rafael Espíndola > Cc: llvm-dev; Release-testers; openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org); > LLDB Dev; cfe-dev > Subject: Re:

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers

On 13 June 2016 at 14:23, David Chisnall via lldb-dev wrote: > I don’t think that this makes it simple for anyone. Existing packaging tools > understand dot notation and know that 3.10 > 3.9, even if interpreting the > dot as a decimal point would mean that it didn’t.

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers

On 13 Jun 2016, at 14:14, Rafael Espíndola via cfe-dev wrote: > >> The 4.1 release gives us the opportunity to drop support for 3.x >> bitcode formats, so I don't think we should move to 4.x until we have >> older bitcode features that we really want to drop. There