The expected flakey works a bit differently then you are described:
* Run the tests
* If it passes, it goes as a successful test and we are done
* Run the test again
* If it is passes the 2nd time then record it as expected failure (IMO
expected falkey would be a better result, but we don't have
Thanks, Tamas.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Tamas Berghammer
wrote:
> The expected flakey works a bit differently then you are described:
> * Run the tests
> * If it passes, it goes as a successful test and we are done
> * Run the test again
> * If it is passes the
Hmm, the flakey behavior may be specific to dwo. Testing it locally as
unconditionally flaky on Linux is failing on dwarf. All the ones I see
succeed are dwo. I wouldn't expect a diff there but that seems to be the
case.
So, the request still stands but I won't be surprised if we find that dwo