Re: [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

> On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:41 PM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Hans Wennborg wrote: >> Breaking this out into a separate thread since it's kind of a separate >> issue, and to make sure people see it. >> >> If you have opinions on this, please chime in. I'd like to col

Re: [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > Breaking this out into a separate thread since it's kind of a separate > issue, and to make sure people see it. > > If you have opinions on this, please chime in. I'd like to collect as > many arguments here as possible to make a good decisio

Re: [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

. > > > To clarify my point: I don't have a particular opinion about bumping the major number for whatever other reason than breaking the compatibility, but I'd probably suggest that we rewrite the compatibility policy to say something like "The current LLVM version support loading any bitcode sinc

Re: [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

> On Jun 13, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Mehdi Amini via lldb-dev > mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > > On Jun 13, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Hans Wennborg > > wrote: > > > > Breaking this out into a separate thre

Re: [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Mehdi Amini via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Jun 13, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > > > Breaking this out into a separate thread since it's kind of a separate > > issue, and to make sure people see it. > > Thanks! > > > > > If yo

Re: [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

> On Jun 13, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > Breaking this out into a separate thread since it's kind of a separate > issue, and to make sure people see it. Thanks! > > If you have opinions on this, please chime in. I'd like to collect as > many arguments here as possible to make a

[lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

Breaking this out into a separate thread since it's kind of a separate issue, and to make sure people see it. If you have opinions on this, please chime in. I'd like to collect as many arguments here as possible to make a good decision. The main contestants are 4.0 and 3.10, and I've seen folks be