Re: [lldb-dev] building only lldb with debug symbols

2018-06-28 Thread Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
If you are on macOS, then the Xcode build has a "Debug" configuration which 
builds clang/llvm Release+asserts with no debug info, and lldb at -O0 with 
debug info.

Jim


> On Jun 28, 2018, at 2:58 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev 
>  wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 at 04:34, Adrian Harris via lldb-dev
>  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Everyone,
>> 
>> I'm writing a gdb-server for a new architecture and need to be able to debug 
>> lldb to track down issues. Unfortunately disk space is tight here and the 
>> llvm debug build consumes north of 40Gb with debug symbols. Is there any way 
>> to build *only* lldb with debug symbols (and no optimization)?
> 
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> This is a somewhat non-standard configuration, but there are a couple
> of ways you could achieve that. A couple which come to mind are:
> - If you're fine with hacking the cmake files then you could just
> insert something like
> set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -g0")
> into the root llvm CMakeLists.txt
> and then add
> set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -g")
> to lldb's CMakeLists.txt
> 
> - If you want a solution which does not involve modifying the cmake
> files, you could build llvm and lldb separately. The llvm could be
> built with -g0 (or even in release mode if you really want) and then
> the stanalone lldb build would be -g.
> 
> - You can also try building with -gsplit-dwarf
> (LLVM_USE_SPLIT_DWARF=On) to see if that saves enough space for things
> to work for you.
> 
> pl
> ___
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev


Re: [lldb-dev] building only lldb with debug symbols

2018-06-28 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 at 04:34, Adrian Harris via lldb-dev
 wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm writing a gdb-server for a new architecture and need to be able to debug 
> lldb to track down issues. Unfortunately disk space is tight here and the 
> llvm debug build consumes north of 40Gb with debug symbols. Is there any way 
> to build *only* lldb with debug symbols (and no optimization)?

Hi Adrian,

This is a somewhat non-standard configuration, but there are a couple
of ways you could achieve that. A couple which come to mind are:
- If you're fine with hacking the cmake files then you could just
insert something like
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -g0")
into the root llvm CMakeLists.txt
and then add
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -g")
to lldb's CMakeLists.txt

- If you want a solution which does not involve modifying the cmake
files, you could build llvm and lldb separately. The llvm could be
built with -g0 (or even in release mode if you really want) and then
the stanalone lldb build would be -g.

- You can also try building with -gsplit-dwarf
(LLVM_USE_SPLIT_DWARF=On) to see if that saves enough space for things
to work for you.

pl
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev


[lldb-dev] building only lldb with debug symbols

2018-06-27 Thread Adrian Harris via lldb-dev
Hi Everyone,

I'm writing a gdb-server for a new architecture and need to be able to debug 
lldb to track down issues. Unfortunately disk space is tight here and the llvm 
debug build consumes north of 40Gb with debug symbols. Is there any way to 
build *only* lldb with debug symbols (and no optimization)?

Thanks!
Adrian
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev