Re: [lldb-dev] debugserver and llvm

That is fine. > On Aug 29, 2016, at 11:40 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > I think the easiest way to do this is to copy the current implementation to > StdStringExtractor and then have debugserver use that. That only requires > 1-2 lines of code change in debugserver, and

Re: [lldb-dev] debugserver and llvm

Making a StringRefExtractor, switching everything over to that, and then moving StringExtractor to debugserver once everything else is using StringRefExtractor seems like a reasonable approach On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:12 AM Greg Clayton wrote: > > > On Aug 29, 2016, at

Re: [lldb-dev] debugserver and llvm

> On Aug 29, 2016, at 10:58 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > I don't plan to change debugserver's link requirements. What I'm saying is > that debugserver is including StringExtractor.h cross-project from LLDB, and > so even something as simple as including an LLVM header

Re: [lldb-dev] debugserver and llvm

I don't plan to change debugserver's link requirements. What I'm saying is that debugserver is including StringExtractor.h cross-project from LLDB, and so even something as simple as including an LLVM header from StringExtractor.h will (if I understand correctly) break debugserver. If I'm