Great, thanks for filing, Dawn!
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:08 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:43PM -0700, via lldb-dev wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 03:37:52PM -0700, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev wrote:
> > > On Linux on non-virtualized hardware, I currently see the
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:43PM -0700, via lldb-dev wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 03:37:52PM -0700, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev wrote:
> > On Linux on non-virtualized hardware, I currently see the failures below on
> > Ubuntu 14.04.2 using a setup like this:
> > [...]
> >
> > ninja check-lldb
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Tamas Berghammer tbergham...@google.com
wrote:
Going back to the original question I think you have more test failures
then expected. As Chaoren mentioned all TestDataFormatterLibc* tests are
failing because of a missing dependency,
Thanks, Tamas. I'm going
So specifying CC=/usr/bin/gcc CXX=/usr/bin/g++ cmake -GNinja ...
did the trick for getting rid of the libc++ issues. I think I may try to
see if we can get those tests to make a run-time check to see if the
inferior is linked against libc++, and if not, to skip it. We can have
lldb do it by
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:39:14PM -0700, Todd Fiala wrote:
I may dig into that if nobody beats me to it. I did the original
multiprocessing work on dosep ~1.5 years ago and it may be doing something
goofy.
Cool! It would be awesome if you could have a look - I've been meaning to dig
Sorry, kernel bug is probably the wrong word. It's a problem specific to
WMware.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Chaoren Lin chaor...@google.com wrote:
Are you running VMware by any chance? TestStepOverWatchpoint fails on
VMware because of a kernel bug.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Todd
Ah okay, so we are working with libc++ on Ubuntu, that's good to hear.
Pre-14.04 I gave up on it.
We're still using libstdc++ for lldb itself. libc++ is used to compile
inferiors for the TestDataFormatterLibcc* tests. I don't actually know if
libc++ works with lldb. Sorry to get your hopes
Ah drats! Okay. Baby steps :-D
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Chaoren Lin chaor...@google.com wrote:
Ah okay, so we are working with libc++ on Ubuntu, that's good to hear.
Pre-14.04 I gave up on it.
We're still using libstdc++ for lldb itself. libc++ is used to compile
inferiors for
Can't comment on the failures for Linux, but I don't think we have a good
handle on the unexpected successes. I only added that information to the
output about a week ago, before that unexpected successes were actually
going unnoticed.
It's likely that someone could just go in there and remove
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Zachary Turner ztur...@google.com wrote:
Can't comment on the failures for Linux, but I don't think we have a good
handle on the unexpected successes. I only added that information to the
output about a week ago, before that unexpected successes were actually
10 matches
Mail list logo