Re: [lldb-dev] unable to build lldb 3.8

2016-03-19 Thread Peter Steinbach via lldb-dev
Dear all, as a follow-up, are there any plans to make lldb support CUDA, OpenCL or SPIR-V based platforms in the near future? Best, P ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] unable to build lldb 3.8

2016-03-16 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
This is just a wild guess, but could you try running cmake with -DLLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX=64. I remember we've had a need for that in the past for systems which store libraries in lib64. Some provisions were put in place to autodetect it, but i'm not sure if they completely work. On 16 March 2016 at

Re: [lldb-dev] unable to build lldb 3.8

2016-03-16 Thread Peter Steinbach via lldb-dev
Hi Pavel, thank you for jumping on this thread and giving this honest answer. I had a look at the build tree and indeed all binaries appear to be where they should be, i.e. build/bin, build/lib* and build/lib64/python2.7 etc. I'll do as you suggest and copy them to their final destination for

Re: [lldb-dev] unable to build lldb 3.8

2016-03-16 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
Hi Peter, thank you for the report, you are writing to the right list. Unfortunately, I am not aware of anyone in LLDB, who actually uses the "make install" functionality, so it's very well possible that it's broken. I can take a look at it, but I won't be able to do that for a couple of weeks

[lldb-dev] unable to build lldb 3.8

2016-03-16 Thread Peter Steinbach via lldb-dev
Hi to all, quick disclaimer: if this is the wrong mailing list, please let me know and accept my apologies. But I am not sure, if this is a bug or just me taking the wrong steps to build lldb. Feel free to suggest redirection. I wanted to build the entire llvm 3.8 suite to explore some