[lldb-dev] [Bug 36687] Defective out-of-tree builds with LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON

2018-03-12 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36687 lab...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |lab...@google.com CC|

[lldb-dev] [Bug 36692] New: "frame variable" reports incorrect values for structs with float fields

2018-03-12 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36692 Bug ID: 36692 Summary: "frame variable" reports incorrect values for structs with float fields Product: lldb Version: 5.0 Hardware: PC OS: MacOS X

[lldb-dev] [Bug 36694] New: LLDB compile error on s390x: "

2018-03-12 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36694 Bug ID: 36694 Summary: LLDB compile error on s390x: " Product: lldb Version: 6.0 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P

Re: [lldb-dev] increase timeout for tests?

2018-03-12 Thread Davide Italiano via lldb-dev
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:01 PM, Jim Ingham wrote: > The problem with having no timeouts is that you have to then be fairly > careful how you write tests. You can't do: > > while (1) { >print("Set a breakpoint here and hit it a few times then stop the test"); > } > >

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb compiled from source 5X slower than homebrew or default lldb

2018-03-12 Thread Adrian Prantl via lldb-dev
If this is a Mac I would recommend to build both lldbs in RelWithDebInfo mode and then run them through Instruments and compare the traces. I'd be very interested in learning what the cause for the slowdown is. -- adrian > On Mar 12, 2018, at 2:57 PM, Timothee Cour

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb compiled from source 5X slower than homebrew or default lldb

2018-03-12 Thread Timothee Cour via lldb-dev
after further inspection it turns out it's a performance regression between llvm 5 and llvm 6: $homebrew_D/Cellar/llvm/5.0.1/lldb -s test_lldb.txt -- prog 8 seconds $homebrew_D/Cellar/llvm/6.0.0/bin/lldb -s test_lldb.txt -- prog 40 seconds cat test_lldb.txt: ``` b FOO r bt q ``` prog is some

Re: [lldb-dev] increase timeout for tests?

2018-03-12 Thread Davide Italiano via lldb-dev
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:45 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > > > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 at 18:40, Davide Italiano wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Greg Clayton wrote: >> > It would be great to look into these and see what is

Re: [lldb-dev] increase timeout for tests?

2018-03-12 Thread Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
The problem with having no timeouts is that you have to then be fairly careful how you write tests. You can't do: while (1) { print("Set a breakpoint here and hit it a few times then stop the test"); } because if the breakpoint setting fails the test can run forever. And we wait forever

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb compiled from source 5X slower than homebrew or default lldb

2018-03-12 Thread Adrian Prantl via lldb-dev
Have you tried diff'ing your cmake invocation against the on used by homebrew? -- adrian > On Mar 9, 2018, at 12:59 AM, Timothee Cour via lldb-dev > wrote: > > while testing out https://github.com/llvm-mirror/lldb/pull/3 I noticed > that when I compiled lldb from