Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [lit] check-all hanging

-llvm-dev + lldb-dev for the lldv test failures. > On Jan 3, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Joel E. Denny wrote: > > All, > > Thanks for the replies. Kuba: For LLDB, when were things expected to have > improved? It's possible things improved for me at some point, but this isn't > something I've found

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [lit] check-all hanging

> On Jan 3, 2019, at 8:30 AM, Frédéric Riss wrote: > > -llvm-dev + lldb-dev for the lldv test failures. > >> On Jan 3, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Joel E. Denny > > wrote: > >> Expected Passes: 57489 >> Expected Failures : 276 >> Unsupported Tests : 1883 >>

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [lit] check-all hanging

On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 23:47:59 +0100, Adrian Prantl via lldb-dev wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2019, at 8:30 AM, Frédéric Riss wrote: > >> I immediately ran it again and saw one new unexpected fail: > >> lldb-Suite :: tools/lldb-mi/syntax/TestMiSyntax.py > > > > Adrian, do we have remaining flakiness