[lldb-dev] [Bug 46014] New: inconsistent behaviors for calling function va_arg() at -O3 (-O0 is correct)

2020-05-21 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46014 Bug ID: 46014 Summary: inconsistent behaviors for calling function va_arg() at -O3 (-O0 is correct) Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-21 Thread Philip Reames via lldb-dev
All of this sounds reasonable to me, but we don't directly follow the upstream release cadence so I'm an interested observer at most. Philip On 5/21/20 11:59 AM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: Hi, I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The current process is

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-21 Thread John McCall via lldb-dev
On 21 May 2020, at 14:59, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: Hi, I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The current process is documented here: https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html There are two parts to this proposal. The first is a list of

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-21 Thread Fāng-ruì Sòng via lldb-dev
On 2020-05-21, Michał Górny via cfe-dev wrote: >On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 11:59 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers >wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The >> current process is documented here: >> https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-21 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 05/21/2020 05:38 PM, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > On 2020-05-21, Michał Górny via cfe-dev wrote: >> On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 11:59 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The >>> current process is documented

[lldb-dev] [Bug 46029] New: inconsistent behaviors at -O3 (-O0 is correct)

2020-05-21 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46029 Bug ID: 46029 Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -O3 (-O0 is correct) Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

[lldb-dev] [Bug 46030] New: inconsistent behaviors at -O1 (-O0 is correct)

2020-05-21 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46030 Bug ID: 46030 Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -O1 (-O0 is correct) Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

2020-05-21 Thread Dimitry Andric via lldb-dev
On 20 May 2020, at 03:22, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and > uploading > binaries. > > If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about > a month > to get your fix in. To request

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

2020-05-21 Thread Michał Górny via lldb-dev
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 18:22 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and > uploading > binaries. > > If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about > a month > to get your fix

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-21 Thread Michał Górny via lldb-dev
On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 11:59 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The > current process is documented here: > https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html > > There are two parts to this proposal. The first

[lldb-dev] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-21 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
Hi, I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The current process is documented here: https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html There are two parts to this proposal. The first is a list of clarifications, which are things we are currently doing that aren't

[lldb-dev] RFC: Release qualification criteria

2020-05-21 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
Hi, I'm splitting this discussion off of my RFC for release process changes. We currently have no official release qualification criteria. In other words, we don't have any blocking tests that need to pass in order to make a new release. We do time-based releases, which is not always