Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-14 Thread Sean Silva via lldb-dev
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Eric Christopher via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:43 AM Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:03 PM Hal Finkel via lldb-dev < >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-14 Thread Chandler Carruth via lldb-dev
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:32 AM Richard Smith via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Hal Finkel via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> - Original Message - >> > From: "Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev" >> > To:

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-14 Thread Aaron Ballman via lldb-dev
Thank you for raising this question! I think 3.10 makes sense until we have a strong enough breaking change (in anything, not just LLVM bit code) to warrant bumping to 4.0. ~Aaron On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev wrote: > Breaking this out into

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-14 Thread Eric Christopher via lldb-dev
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:43 AM Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:03 PM Hal Finkel via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> - Original Message - >> > From: "Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev" >> > To:

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)

2016-06-13 Thread Hal Finkel via lldb-dev
- Original Message - > From: "Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev" > To: "llvm-dev" , "cfe-dev" , > "LLDB Dev" , > "openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org)" > Cc: "r