[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [DirectX] Move DXIL ResourceKind and ElementType to DXILABI.h. NFC (PR #78225)

github-actions[bot] wrote: :warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning: You can test this locally with the following command: ``bash git-clang-format --diff b0fff11ff5d46deb5df3485b87b22bb61e93910f edca247b1dec13f7549ad7d43881d0c2b8f34d62 --

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [DirectX] Move DXIL ResourceKind and ElementType to DXILABI.h. NFC (PR #78225)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-directx Author: Justin Bogner (bogner) Changes --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78225.diff 4 Files Affected: - (modified) llvm/include/llvm/Frontend/HLSL/HLSLResource.h (+4-48) - (modified) llvm/include/llvm/Support/

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [DirectX] Move DXIL ResourceKind and ElementType to DXILABI.h. NFC (PR #78225)

https://github.com/bogner created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78225 None ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] 1b922e1 - Revert "[DFAJumpThreading] Extends the bitwidth of state from uint64_t to APInt"

Author: Vitaly Buka Date: 2024-01-15T17:50:16-08:00 New Revision: 1b922e19e3c0047206e7f6ba62e44d1f17880ec5 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b922e19e3c0047206e7f6ba62e44d1f17880ec5 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b922e19e3c0047206e7f6ba62e44d1f17880ec5.diff L

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [clang] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

brad0 wrote: > Uh oh, seems like I couldn't merge it with the tool either... Guess I'll open > a new PR to merge this, would that be okay? @brad0 @s-barannikov Ya, sure. Whatever path is easier and quickest for you. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 __

[llvm-branch-commits] [compiler-rt] [clang-tools-extra] [clang] [flang] [llvm] [Flang][OpenMP] Restructure recursive lowering in `createBodyOfOp` (PR #77761)

https://github.com/kparzysz updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77761 >From 1b5524ae8874e389d373a55417919afa56beb2b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Krzysztof Parzyszek Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 15:53:07 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Flang][OpenMP] Restructure recursive lowering in `cre

[llvm-branch-commits] [compiler-rt] [llvm] [clang-tools-extra] [clang] [flang] [Flang][OpenMP] Restructure recursive lowering in `createBodyOfOp` (PR #77761)

https://github.com/kparzysz updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77761 >From 1b5524ae8874e389d373a55417919afa56beb2b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Krzysztof Parzyszek Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 15:53:07 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] [Flang][OpenMP] Restructure recursive lowering in `createB

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [Flang][OpenMP] Restructure recursive lowering in `createBodyOfOp` (PR #77761)

kiranchandramohan wrote: @tblah mentions that this patch fixes the unstructured code issue in worksharing loop with collapse. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77329. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77761 ___ llvm-branch-commits mail

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

s-barannikov wrote: Yes, sure https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] 91eb719 - Revert "[mlir][ExecutionEngine] Add support for global constructors and destructors"

Author: Cullen Rhodes Date: 2024-01-15T14:10:08Z New Revision: 91eb719cae57c7787af56401d2e63545cc53bc75 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/91eb719cae57c7787af56401d2e63545cc53bc75 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/91eb719cae57c7787af56401d2e63545cc53bc75.diff LOG:

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [llvm] [SPARC] Prefer RDPC over CALL to implement GETPCX for 64-bit target (PR #77196)

koachan wrote: Uh oh, seems like I couldn't merge it with the tool either... Guess I'll open a new PR to merge this, would that be okay? @brad0 @s-barannikov https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77196 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-br

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [Flang][OpenMP] Restructure recursive lowering in `createBodyOfOp` (PR #77761)

https://github.com/skatrak commented: Thanks Krzysztof! This looks ok to me, but I suggest waiting for approval from a second reviewer. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77761 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [Flang][OpenMP] Restructure recursive lowering in `createBodyOfOp` (PR #77761)

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +! RUN: bbc -fopenmp -o - %s | FileCheck %s + +! Check that this test can be lowered successfully. +! See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/74348 + +! CHECK-LABEL: func.func @_QPsb +! CHECK: omp.parallel skatrak wrote: I think it would

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [Flang][OpenMP] Restructure recursive lowering in `createBodyOfOp` (PR #77761)

https://github.com/skatrak edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77761 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits