Author: Animesh Kumar
Date: 2024-02-29T12:28:28+05:30
New Revision: 3c012fe491aa04a471e0d5ae6eb29e5b1fada65b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3c012fe491aa04a471e0d5ae6eb29e5b1fada65b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3c012fe491aa04a471e0d5ae6eb29e5b1fada65b.diff
https://github.com/ayermolo approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82129
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ilovepi wrote:
So, if DFAJumpThreading is ever on by default, then I think its pretty simple
to repurpose `-enable-dfa-jump-thread` to enable the behavior in the pass, and
we can drop `-enable-dfa-jump-optsize` @aeubanks, does that sound like a
better plan?
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83049
>From fc2e672d474442ef83e90c7a41265d6433651b63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:42:24 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Refactor option names, and update test
Created using spr 1.3.4
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83049
>From fc2e672d474442ef83e90c7a41265d6433651b63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:42:24 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Refactor option names, and update test
Created using spr 1.3.4
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83049
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/mirusu400 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83347
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/mirusu400 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83347
On `release/11.x` branch, build failed cause of `numeric_limits`, which are
part of `limits` header.
```bash
ninja -C build
ninja: Entering directory `build'
[1/3] Building CXX object
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83336
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ilovepi wrote:
> Can we have a more principled approach to determine when to allow this pass
> to run than a `cl::opt`? For example, change the `CostThreshold` in the pass
> depending on whether or not the function has `optsize`.
So, I've experimented with this, and I'm not sure this is the
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
Looks fine, but I think merging might need to wait for a point release? CC
@tstellar .
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81800
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 5b91647e3f82c9747c42c3239b7d7f3ade4542a7
Requested by: @jroelofs
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83336.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83336
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83336
Backport 5b91647e3f82c9747c42c3239b7d7f3ade4542a7
Requested by: @jroelofs
>From faed9cbd490450dba5879f130caf1482a0704838 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Roelofs
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 13:03:35 -0800
llvmbot wrote:
@tstellar What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83323
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83323
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83323
Backport 3af5c98200e0b1268f755c3f289be4f73aac4214
Requested by: @azhan92
>From c6fa26b505531aa69a3bed3a6e9e740fdccb9309 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: azhan92
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:27:45 -0500
Subject:
ilovepi wrote:
huh, not sure why spr merged this into a branch, but I'll need to fix that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83188
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Paul Kirth (ilovepi)
Changes
Though DFAJumpThreadingPass typically introduces size increases, targets
optimizing for size may want to enable the pass for certain TUs and
workloads. This change adds options to override the default
https://github.com/ilovepi ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83049
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83188
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
dpaoliello wrote:
@efriedma-quic I think this is ready to land, the MacOS test failure is a known
issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81800
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/matthias-springer edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83286
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
Author: Matthias Springer (matthias-springer)
Changes
When a block signature is converted during dialect conversion, a
`BlockTypeConversionRewrite` object is stored in the stack of rewrites. Such an
object represents multiple steps:
- Splitting
https://github.com/matthias-springer edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83286
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/matthias-springer created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83286
When a block signature is converted during dialect conversion a
`BlockTypeConversionRewrite` object is stored in the stack of rewrites. Such an
object represents multiple steps:
- Splitting the old
https://github.com/alexey-bataev approved this pull request.
LG
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82793
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/fhahn edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82793
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83237
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@vgvassilev this may be ready to test.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83237
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -257,22 +241,12 @@ namespace clang {
// If we have any lazy specializations, and the external AST source is
// our chained AST reader, we can just write out the DeclIDs. Otherwise,
// we need to resolve them to actual declarations.
- if (Writer.Chain
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
This is the following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83233. This
simply removes `LazySpecializationInfo` from `RedeclarableTemplateDecl`. I
feel it can
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83237
This is the following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83233. This
simply removes `LazySpecializationInfo` from `RedeclarableTemplateDecl`. I
feel it can make the review process much more easier
https://github.com/paschalis-mpeis ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78432
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> If that's ready to give it a try on our infrastructure I can do it.
I'll try to update the polishing patch. While it might purely be removing
codes, I think it may be better to test on that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83233
vgvassilev wrote:
> > > > Can you rebase on top of #83108 ? That'd make it easier for me to
> > > > review.
> > >
> > >
> > > Weird. It should be on top of #83108 already.
> > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commits/users/ChuanqiXu9/D41416_on_disk_hash_table/
> >
> >
> > Ah, it is a
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > > Can you rebase on top of #83108 ? That'd make it easier for me to review.
> >
> >
> > Weird. It should be on top of #83108 already.
> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commits/users/ChuanqiXu9/D41416_on_disk_hash_table/
>
> Ah, it is a single commit that includes
vgvassilev wrote:
> > Can you rebase on top of #83108 ? That'd make it easier for me to review.
>
> Weird. It should be on top of #83108 already.
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commits/users/ChuanqiXu9/D41416_on_disk_hash_table/
Ah, it is a single commit that includes what's in the
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> Can you rebase on top of #83108 ? That'd make it easier for me to review.
Weird. It should be on top of #83108 already.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83233
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
vgvassilev wrote:
Can you rebase on top of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108 ?
That'd make it easier for me to review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83233
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83233
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
Following up for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108
This follows the suggestion literally from
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83233
Following up for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108
This follows the suggestion literally from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774#issuecomment-1951172457
which introduces
43 matches
Mail list logo
