owenca wrote:
Alternatively, we can backport #107352.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107058
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107350
With this change, we discriminate if the primary template and which partial
specializations would have participated in overload resolution prior to P0522
changes.
We collect those in an initial set. If this s
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96023
>From 958703dfc41c6aa186e5129dc804b532b48ef00e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:39:08 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Finish implementation of P0522
This finishes the clan
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96023
>From da2a66a8b7105a1cbfc5bd98c7b41addc6ec543b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:39:08 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Finish implementation of P0522
This finishes the clan
Author: Valentin Clement (バレンタイン クレメン)
Date: 2024-09-04T21:15:23-07:00
New Revision: 77500cdd0c7894cddbf89210597982c4e06a5331
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/77500cdd0c7894cddbf89210597982c4e06a5331
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/77500cdd0c7894cddbf8921059798
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107137
>From 50c021b09950cf7d6a8f25b1ac0dec246f2325f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:38:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] update pseudoprobe-decoding-inline.test
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107137
>From 50c021b09950cf7d6a8f25b1ac0dec246f2325f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:38:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] update pseudoprobe-decoding-inline.test
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-hexagon
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 43ba1097ee747b4ec5e757762ed0c9df6255a292
Requested by: @huaatian
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107338.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/CodeGen/ModuloSched
llvmbot wrote:
@arsenm What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107338
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107338
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107338
Backport 43ba1097ee747b4ec5e757762ed0c9df6255a292
Requested by: @huaatian
>From 5b44b9cfaa0d87901d029537532bcf8d21259117 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hua Tian
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 19:03:27 +0800
Subject: [
https://github.com/aaupov edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99891
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99891
>From 36197b175681d07b4704e576fb008cec3cc1e05e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 21:10:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Reworked block probe matching
Use new probe ifaces
Get all func
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff bfa0afc8fd9a4cfb4c44146379ea2f6e231661cc
0f455d09f5d2bcd07278debd55e76dfbc1162472 --e
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99891
>From 36197b175681d07b4704e576fb008cec3cc1e05e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 21:10:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Reworked block probe matching
Use new probe ifaces
Get all function
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99891
>From 36197b175681d07b4704e576fb008cec3cc1e05e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 21:10:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Reworked block probe matching
Use new probe ifaces
Get all function
https://github.com/mstorsjo approved this pull request.
I think this looks reasonable, and as you've tested that it works with
llvm-mingw, I guess it works. I haven't tested building it with MSVC though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106155
__
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM. Fixes a crash on valid, and the fix is very unlikely to have unexpected
effects.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107183
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-comm
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
Did a look through, and have no comments. While we could clean up the
`TemplateDeductionResult` enum, I'm hopeful we're getting 'near the end' on it,
and I can't think of a nicer way to break it down, none of the cases are really
well associated with e
arichardson wrote:
@mstorsjo I confirmed that llvm-mingw `./build-compiler-rt.sh
--build-sanitizers` still works, okay to merge?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106155
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
https://github.com/arichardson edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106155
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/arichardson updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106155
>From 43c5b5e825318adabf2cb37ad87f31f17c2bf92d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Richardson
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:41:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?
https://github.com/arichardson updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106155
>From 43c5b5e825318adabf2cb37ad87f31f17c2bf92d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Richardson
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:41:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?
jyknight wrote:
This sounds sketchy to me. Is it really valid to enter a second call inside
another call's CALLSEQ markers, but only if we avoid adding a second nested set
of markers? It feels like attacking the symptom of the issue, but not the root
cause. (I'm not certain it's _not_ valid, b
https://github.com/mjklemm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107236
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -287,3 +287,117 @@ been implemented, but it is closely linked to the
`omp.canonical_loop` work.
Nevertheless, loop transformation that the `collapse` clause for
loop-associated
worksharing constructs defines can be represented by introducing multiple
bounds, step and induc
https://github.com/mjklemm approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107235
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/mjklemm approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107234
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64 -verify-machineinstrs < %s -relocation-model=pic |
FileCheck %s
+
+; Passing a pointer to thread-local storage to a function can be p
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64 -verify-machineinstrs < %s -relocation-model=pic |
FileCheck %s
arsenm wrote:
< %s to th eend, don't need -verify-m
https://github.com/mjklemm approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107233
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: paperchalice
Date: 2024-09-04T21:56:16+08:00
New Revision: 31eaa4e9440ef2af226f1a0ceed6d6d625b0e25a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/31eaa4e9440ef2af226f1a0ceed6d6d625b0e25a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/31eaa4e9440ef2af226f1a0ceed6d6d625b0e25a.diff
https://github.com/lntue approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106102
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
cdevadas wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Sep 4, 8:51 AM EDT**: @cdevadas started a stack merge that includes this
pull request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/106605).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106605
_
skatrak wrote:
PR Stack:
- #107232
- #107233
- #107234
- #107235
- #107236
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107236
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bra
skatrak wrote:
PR Stack:
- #107232
- #107233
- #107234
- #107235
- #107236
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107235
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bra
skatrak wrote:
PR Stack:
- #107232
- #107233
- #107234
- #107235
- #107236
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107234
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bra
skatrak wrote:
PR Stack:
- #107232
- #107233
- #107234
- #107235
- #107236
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107233
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bra
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-openmp
Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak)
Changes
This patch describes the loop wrapper approach to represent loop-associated
constructs in the OpenMP MLIR dialect and documents current limitations and
ongoing efforts.
---
Full diff: https://github.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-openmp
Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak)
Changes
This patch documents the MLIR representation of OpenMP compound constructs
discussed in
[this](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-representing-combined-composite-constructs-in-the-openmp-dialect/76986)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-openmp
Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak)
Changes
This patch documents the clause-based op represetation discussed in [this
RFC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clause-based-representation-of-openmp-dialect-operations/79053)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak)
Changes
This patch documents op naming conventions discussed in [this
RFC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-uniformize-openmp-dialect-operation-names/77715).
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/
https://github.com/skatrak created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107236
This patch documents the MLIR representation of OpenMP compound constructs
discussed in
[this](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-representing-combined-composite-constructs-in-the-openmp-dialect/76986)
and
[thi
https://github.com/skatrak created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107234
This patch documents the clause-based op represetation discussed in [this
RFC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clause-based-representation-of-openmp-dialect-operations/79053).
>From 47e8403d4adaba03696862ac3ea
https://github.com/skatrak created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107235
This patch describes the loop wrapper approach to represent loop-associated
constructs in the OpenMP MLIR dialect and documents current limitations and
ongoing efforts.
>From 4fbe52392662da14779032e967de5cbc46
https://github.com/skatrak created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107233
This patch documents op naming conventions discussed in [this
RFC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-uniformize-openmp-dialect-operation-names/77715).
>From 9affb197d2eb208ea25312a02fa0f93ec64d7513 Mon Sep 17 00
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102070
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107214
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106952
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: cor3ntin (cor3ntin)
Changes
We were incorrectly not deduplicating results when looking up `_` which, for a
lambda init capture, would result in an ambiguous lookup.
The same bug caused some diagnostic notes to be emitted twice.
Fixes #10
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107214
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107214
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107214
We were incorrectly not deduplicating results when looking up `_` which, for a
lambda init capture, would result in an ambiguous lookup.
The same bug caused some diagnostic notes to be emitted twice.
Fixes #1
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: cor3ntin (cor3ntin)
Changes
In #78436 we made some SourceLocExpr dependent to
deal with the fact that their value should reflect the name of specialized
function - rather than the rtemplate in which they are first used.
However SourceLocE
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107212
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107212
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107210
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107211
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
SamTebbs33 wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/107211?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warnin
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107211
None
>From e99c4dca4bfb7bed5c3069e056fb566b9c655eaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samuel Tebbs
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 11:07:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add user search
---
graphite-demo/frontend.jsx | 23 +++
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107210
>From 4dae516fc2be004f79362b455b835754eeda953d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samuel Tebbs
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 11:05:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add frontend for search
---
graphite-demo/frontend.jsx | 56 +
SamTebbs33 wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/107210?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warnin
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107210
None
>From 8296e727435492d4a5b49deea76c098d6f54081f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samuel Tebbs
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 11:05:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add frontend for search
---
graphite-demo/frontend.jsx
tru wrote:
@AaronBallman Are we ready to merge this into the -final version?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102070
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-b
Martin =?utf-8?q?Storsjö?= ,
Martin =?utf-8?q?Storsjö?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
zmodem wrote:
> what do you think about backporting this to the 19.x release?
Sounds good to me, but if rc4 is the last release candidate, this would
probably have to go in a future minor release.
https://githu
mstorsjo wrote:
> Also sorry for filing the backport before sorting out buildbot breakage
> caused by the patch...
FWIW, it seems like all buildbots were happy after the two follow-up test fixes
that I have included here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107146
__
66 matches
Mail list logo
