@@ -18,6 +18,6 @@
.globl _start
_start:
.data
- .word foo@PLT - .
- .word foo@PLT - . + 1
- .word foo@PLT - . - 1
+ .word %plt(foo - .)
lenary wrote:
Yeah I don't like `%plt(foo - .)`, because the thing being put into the
instruction is really the differe
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132569
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132569
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132569
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-github-workflow
Author: Aiden Grossman (boomanaiden154)
Changes
This patch migrates the CI over to the new compute_projects.py script
for calculating what projects need to be tested based on a change to
LLVM.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm
@@ -2289,25 +2314,6 @@ bool
TargetLoweringObjectFileWasm::shouldPutJumpTableInFunctionSection(
return false;
}
-const MCExpr *TargetLoweringObjectFileWasm::lowerRelativeReference(
MaskRay wrote:
I'll pre-commit this. wasm and xcoff did cargo culting and ad
@@ -66,20 +67,34 @@ static void emitEnumClass(const Record &enumDef, StringRef
enumName,
os << "};\n\n";
}
-static void emitParserPrinter(const EnumAttr &enumAttr, StringRef qualName,
+static void emitParserPrinter(const EnumInfo &enumInfo, StringRef qualName,
@@ -18,6 +18,6 @@
.globl _start
_start:
.data
- .word foo@PLT - .
- .word foo@PLT - . + 1
- .word foo@PLT - . - 1
+ .word %plt(foo - .)
MaskRay wrote:
The IR doesn't model the current location (DOT). Instead, It computes
`SymA-SymB+offset`.
`SymB` might n
https://github.com/krzysz00 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132349
>From b7e84740dbe3795a87deb0e7b7fe5d92d181f7b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Drewniak
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 23:08:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [mlir] Improve EnumProp, making it take an EnumInfo
This
ylzsx wrote:
@MaskRay @xen0n Could you help me review the code?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123680
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
@@ -18,6 +18,6 @@
.globl _start
_start:
.data
- .word foo@PLT - .
- .word foo@PLT - . + 1
- .word foo@PLT - . - 1
+ .word %plt(foo - .)
jrtc27 wrote:
Well my overarching point would be that user-facing syntax should not be
beholden to arbitrary historic i
@@ -128,8 +143,95 @@ namespace llvm {
inline ::llvm::raw_ostream &operator<<(::llvm::raw_ostream &p, {0} value) {{
auto valueStr = stringifyEnum(value);
)";
- os << formatv(parsedAndPrinterStart, qualName, cppNamespace,
-enumAttr.getSummary());
+
+ const cha
https://github.com/krzysz00 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132148
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
HerrCai0907 wrote:
ping @thurstond
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131694
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/koachan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130967
>From e2e0d44800b65a8fbddd6234c2ee9f83af92d7da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Koakuma
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:14:42 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add missing NO-VIS lines
Created using spr 1.3.5
---
llvm/test/M
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132110
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
16 matches
Mail list logo