carlosgalvezp wrote:
@HerrCai0907 Could you approve the PR so we can bring it to the release?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137775
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailma
https://github.com/carlosgalvezp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137775
>From 387c2886b68b1eaf68916e4b08e8d92966a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carlos Galvez
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:13:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[clang-tidy]=20Do=20not=20pass=20any=20file=20w?
carlosgalvezp wrote:
@tstellar Can you advice on what the next steps are to get this merged into the
release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134215
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
https://github.com/carlosgalvezp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134215
>From d868cc50a9aa0884a360c20179a8a921417d867c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carlos Galvez
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:28:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Fix broken HeaderFilterRegex when read from
c
carlosgalvezp wrote:
> It's ok as far as it works. Personally if we do not utilize that optional,
> then probably it should be removed.
It's essentially a revert. I agree that our usage of optional in the Options is
not good, we should improve that on a separate patch.
https://github.com/llvm
