[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [llvm][CodeGen] avoid repeated interval calculation in window scheduler (#132352) (PR #134775)

2025-04-11 Thread Hua Tian via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/huaatian approved this pull request. LGTM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134775 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [llvm][CodeGen] avoid repeated interval calculation in window scheduler (#132352) (PR #134775)

2025-04-11 Thread Hua Tian via llvm-branch-commits
huaatian wrote: LGTM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134775 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [llvm][CodeGen] avoid repeated interval calculation in window scheduler (#132352) (PR #134775)

2025-04-11 Thread Hua Tian via llvm-branch-commits
huaatian wrote: > @Huatian can you review this cherry-pick? OK https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134775 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] release/19.x: [llvm][CodeGen] Resolve issues when updating live intervals in window scheduler (#101945) (PR #107338)

2024-09-10 Thread Hua Tian via llvm-branch-commits
huaatian wrote: > this was merged - not sure why github shows it as closed instead. Okay, I see that this PR has already been merged. Thank you! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107338 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/19.x: [llvm][CodeGen] Resolve issues when updating live intervals in window scheduler (#101945) (PR #107338)

2024-09-09 Thread Hua Tian via llvm-branch-commits
huaatian wrote: > Hi, since we are wrapping up LLVM 19.1.0 we are very strict with the fixes we > pick at this point. Can you please respond to the following questions to help > me understand if this has to be included in the final release or not. > > Is this PR a fix for a regression or a cri