Martin =?utf-8?q?Storsj=C3=B6?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132483
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132478
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
The commit itself seems quite simple and seems safe on its own. I guess the
main worry would be that some build system configure checks may, in theory, now
consider it as available and start using a different, potentially unintended,
code p
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101904
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88759
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88016
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
I think it's fine to keep it, thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84590
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84844
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
cjacek wrote:
It's great to hear that it's enough got Rust. I re-reviewed those commits for
impact on non-ARM64EC target and I think it's safe enough.
One thing we could consider is to skip .def file parser part of it. The main
downside of it would be that it would require skipping some tests
cjacek wrote:
I have similar feeling to @efriedma-quic . There is probably not much use of
those fixes on their own. They are a step towards stand-alone toolchain and are
required for the linker, both for its libs part and to generate test cases, but
they alone are not enough. They will be mor
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81800
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80544
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
12 matches
Mail list logo