https://github.com/michaelmaitland approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115858
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-co
michaelmaitland wrote:
I measured this patch on spec for an in-order and an out-of-order core.
For the out-of-order core, 557.xz_r saw a regression.
For the in-order core, I see regression on 456.hmmer and 458.sjeng.
I saw no other significant improvements or regressions.
These findings, comb
michaelmaitland wrote:
For the recent scheduler patches, the common theme is we saw another target did
something brought that functionality to RISC-V. How do we know that these
changes are sensible defaults for RISC-V cores? Are you making measurements on
any cores? Are they in order, out of o
