tstellar wrote:
Hi @topperc (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/tstellar closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91514
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tstellar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91514
>From be239653149f45e4a23036c840ae0bcdc9818161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Topper
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:17:50 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV] Add canonical ISA string as Module metadata in
IR.
https://github.com/tstellar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91514
>From 285cfe36fe2a5d8c5ba111f882394405a3f78f31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Topper
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:17:50 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV] Add canonical ISA string as Module metadata in
IR.
efriedma-quic wrote:
If LTO was completely broken, this seems worth taking. And the changes look
safe. LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91514
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
tstellar wrote:
@efriedma-quic Any objections to backporting this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91514
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
ilovepi wrote:
This tends to bite anyone using LTO with RISCV. In particular I’m concerned
about the impact on Rust, since they’ll pin LLVM until the LLVM 19 release.
About 60% of Fuchsia is implemented in rust. More if you count only count
userland.
We’re hoping to avoid a situation where
topperc wrote:
> Can you briefly summarize why this is important to backport? At first glance,
> this is only relevant for LTO with mixed architecture specifications,
> which... I can see someone might want it, I guess, but it seems pretty easy
> to work around not having it.
It's not just
efriedma-quic wrote:
Can you briefly summarize why this is important to backport? At first glance,
this is only relevant for LTO with mixed architecture specifications, which...
I can see someone might want it, I guess, but it seems pretty easy to work
around not having it.
https://github.com/topperc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91514
>From ee109e3627e5b93297bfc7908f684eedb5feb5ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Topper
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:17:50 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV] Add canonical ISA string as Module metadata in
IR.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Craig Topper (topperc)
Changes
Resolves #91513
---
Patch is 57.83 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91514.diff
10 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/topperc created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91514
Resolves #91513
>From f45df1cf1b74957e2f9609b982e964654f9af824 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Topper
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:17:50 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV] Add canonical ISA string as Module
https://github.com/topperc milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91514
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
13 matches
Mail list logo