wangpc-pp wrote:
> > [EarlyIfCvt] Take branch probablities into consideration
>
> It looks like this MR is only adding a target hook, so this title doesn't
> make sense to me
I was planning to add support to RISCV target, but it depends on your early
if-conversion patch. I will hold this PR u
@@ -913,6 +913,10 @@ class TargetInstrInfo : public MCInstrInfo {
return false;
}
+ /// Return true if the target will always try to convert predictable branches
+ /// to selects.
+ virtual bool shouldConvertPredictableBranches() const { return true; }
+
-
https://github.com/paschalis-mpeis edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97710
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/paschalis-mpeis edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97710
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/paschalis-mpeis edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97710
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/paschalis-mpeis edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97710
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Daniel Kiss
Date: 2024-07-10T10:21:33+02:00
New Revision: 74eff4df1d9a050718ebdbce5a71a119282035ae
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/74eff4df1d9a050718ebdbce5a71a119282035ae
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/74eff4df1d9a050718ebdbce5a71a119282035ae.diff
L
Author: Daniel Kiss
Date: 2024-07-10T10:21:36+02:00
New Revision: 74e9e20f0338824eecea0f27d9c1336676a60d3d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/74e9e20f0338824eecea0f27d9c1336676a60d3d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/74e9e20f0338824eecea0f27d9c1336676a60d3d.diff
L
agozillon wrote:
Small ping for some reviewer attention on this PR stack if at all possible, it
would be greatly appreciated!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96266
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83233
>From 2bf5a6ca8bde003b7acf0a9ab7c6e69cc3109e02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:41:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Serialization] Introduce OnDiskHashTable for specializations
Fo
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83237
>From f2e53e44eebab4720a1dbade24fcb14d698fb03f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:41:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Serialization] Code cleanups and polish 83233
---
clang/includ
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@ilya-biryukov I've fixed the crash occured in the reproducer. The root reason
is that, previously, I wouldn't load all the specializations for paritial
specializations. But this is not safe. I think you can test it again.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83237
_
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@vgvassilev In the newest version, I introduced a new hasher
TemplateArgumentHasher and use this new hasher to calculate the hash value for
template arguments. We thought this may be harder. But I just realized, we
don't have to provide a very precise results at first. Since
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83237
>From f2e53e44eebab4720a1dbade24fcb14d698fb03f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:41:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Serialization] Code cleanups and polish 83233
---
clang/in
Author: Fabian Ritter
Date: 2024-07-10T12:12:19+02:00
New Revision: 2b9ea3555e7f5996393e304d3810e704ea5feeeb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2b9ea3555e7f5996393e304d3810e704ea5feeeb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2b9ea3555e7f5996393e304d3810e704ea5feeeb.diff
arsenm wrote:
Needs target + test?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97808
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
arsenm wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96759
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
arsenm wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Jul 10, 8:37 AM EDT**: @arsenm started a stack merge that includes this
pull request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/96443).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96443
__
arsenm wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Jul 10, 8:37 AM EDT**: @arsenm started a stack merge that includes this
pull request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/96444).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96444
__
cdevadas wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96162
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
cdevadas wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96163
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -658,17 +658,17 @@ define amdgpu_kernel void
@image_bvh_intersect_ray_nsa_reassign(ptr %p_node_ptr,
;
; GFX1013-LABEL: image_bvh_intersect_ray_nsa_reassign:
; GFX1013: ; %bb.0:
-; GFX1013-NEXT:s_load_dwordx8 s[0:7], s[0:1], 0x24
+; GFX1013-NEXT:s_load_dwordx8
@@ -1212,8 +1228,14 @@ void SILoadStoreOptimizer::copyToDestRegs(
// Copy to the old destination registers.
const MCInstrDesc &CopyDesc = TII->get(TargetOpcode::COPY);
- const auto *Dest0 = TII->getNamedOperand(*CI.I, OpName);
- const auto *Dest1 = TII->getNamedOperand(*
@@ -866,13 +866,61 @@ def SMRDBufferImm : ComplexPattern;
def SMRDBufferImm32 : ComplexPattern;
def SMRDBufferSgprImm : ComplexPattern;
+class SMRDAlignedLoadPat : PatFrag <(ops node:$ptr), (Op
node:$ptr), [{
+ // Ignore the alignment check if XNACK support is disabled.
+
@@ -658,17 +658,17 @@ define amdgpu_kernel void
@image_bvh_intersect_ray_nsa_reassign(ptr %p_node_ptr,
;
; GFX1013-LABEL: image_bvh_intersect_ray_nsa_reassign:
; GFX1013: ; %bb.0:
-; GFX1013-NEXT:s_load_dwordx8 s[0:7], s[0:1], 0x24
+; GFX1013-NEXT:s_load_dwordx8
https://github.com/cdevadas edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96162
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Alex Bradbury
Date: 2024-07-10T15:28:18+01:00
New Revision: f1f8d8789af2627fd04a0e98203189f6da14a261
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f1f8d8789af2627fd04a0e98203189f6da14a261
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f1f8d8789af2627fd04a0e98203189f6da14a261.diff
https://github.com/koachan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96021
>From dbd8f1f421b397a4907af3811937a7815900876a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Koakuma
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:57:01 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] Don't use ParseForAllFeatures, validate all mnemonics up
front instead
https://github.com/koachan edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96021
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
koachan wrote:
Hmmm, so, change of approach - I decided to follow what the MIPS backend does
and validate all mnemonics early in ParseInstruction, before any operand
parsing is done.
This gets IAS to emit the correct error message for missing instructions.
The misuse of ParseStatus returns sti
https://github.com/koachan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96021
>From dbd8f1f421b397a4907af3811937a7815900876a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Koakuma
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:57:01 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Don't use ParseForAllFeatures, validate all mnemonics up
front ins
https://github.com/s-barannikov approved this pull request.
The downside of this approach is that you lose the ability to report the
missing features (unless you implement it yourself, which would be a code
duplication), that would allow to produce instead better diagnostics like
"instruction
https://github.com/s-barannikov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96021
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/shawbyoung updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96596
>From 05d59574d6260b98a469921eb2fccf5398bfafb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: shawbyoung
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:00:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/18] Added call to matchWithCallsAsAnchors
Created using spr 1.
https://github.com/aaupov edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96596
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ class NameResolver {
}
// Removes a suffix from a function name.
- static StringRef removeSuffix(StringRef Name, StringRef Suffix) {
-const size_t Pos = Name.find(Suffix);
+ static StringRef unify(StringRef Name) {
aaupov wrote:
Le
https://github.com/aaupov commented:
Thanks, LG with one nit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96596
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/kparzysz created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98387
Express the constraints via constituent directives.
>From 263c2357cd686e63b5b78985d3c8c6f3635e69cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:35:56 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clan
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz)
Changes
Express the constraints via constituent directives.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98387.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp (+53-54)
https://github.com/shawbyoung created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98390
Expands the scope of possible block matches by hashing blocks by their
lexicographically ordered function names to provide a looser level of
matching past opcode hash matching in StaleProfileMatching.
Test Pla
https://github.com/shawbyoung closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98390
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt
Author: Shaw Young (shawbyoung)
Changes
Expands the scope of possible block matches by hashing blocks by their
lexicographically ordered function names to provide a looser level of
matching past opcode hash matching in StaleProfileMatching.
Test Pl
https://github.com/shawbyoung updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96596
>From 05d59574d6260b98a469921eb2fccf5398bfafb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: shawbyoung
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:00:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] Added call to matchWithCallsAsAnchors
Created using spr 1.
@@ -4828,26 +4835,28 @@ static bool checkNestingOfRegions(Sema &SemaRef, const
DSAStackTy *Stack,
<< (SemaRef.LangOpts.OpenMP >= 50 ? 1 : 0);
return CurrentRegion != OMPD_simd;
}
- if (ParentRegion == OMPD_atomic) {
+
+ if (EnclosingConstruct == OMPD_atomic) {
@@ -4805,6 +4811,7 @@ static bool checkNestingOfRegions(Sema &SemaRef, const
DSAStackTy *Stack,
<< getOpenMPDirectiveName(CurrentRegion);
return true;
}
+
alexey-bataev wrote:
Remove this extra line
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/983
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2024-07-10T14:33:59-07:00
New Revision: ccefcec4403ec838a62dd944a2a7bd51e061dddf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ccefcec4403ec838a62dd944a2a7bd51e061dddf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ccefcec4403ec838a62dd944a2a7bd51e061dddf.diff
L
https://github.com/aaupov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96596
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Nico Weber
Date: 2024-07-10T20:54:15-04:00
New Revision: 88144b639d4c256e0540ae2754321a487528c77c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/88144b639d4c256e0540ae2754321a487528c77c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/88144b639d4c256e0540ae2754321a487528c77c.diff
LO
koachan wrote:
Merging this for now, but to clarify a little:
> The downside of this approach is that you lose the ability to report the
> missing features (unless you implement it yourself, which would be a code
> duplication), that would allow to produce better diagnostics like
> "instructi
Author: Daniel Kiss
Date: 2024-07-11T08:37:25+02:00
New Revision: 9a74d0613287e7ae86c305b0250e188e3c3de6c3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a74d0613287e7ae86c305b0250e188e3c3de6c3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a74d0613287e7ae86c305b0250e188e3c3de6c3.diff
L
50 matches
Mail list logo
