https://github.com/agozillon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82853
>From 21b05eee943e4f1ad20fcd8f30bd14a0a3317db6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Gozillon
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:13:30 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] update with minor tidying up
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
fl
https://github.com/agozillon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82853
>From 21b05eee943e4f1ad20fcd8f30bd14a0a3317db6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Gozillon
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:13:30 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] update with minor tidying up
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
fl
https://github.com/agozillon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82851
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/agozillon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82853
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/agozillon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82852
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Justin Bogner
Date: 2024-05-10T12:41:18-06:00
New Revision: f5cec3acf9d2664c2209f24cc8ea0c5f3ed7fec6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f5cec3acf9d2664c2209f24cc8ea0c5f3ed7fec6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f5cec3acf9d2664c2209f24cc8ea0c5f3ed7fec6.diff
agozillon wrote:
I made a bit of a mistake not using SPR to land this PR series, so i've ended
up having to directly commit the PR, the associated commit for this PR can be
found here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/435e850ba97ab567a14b6c84d2b27cadb771cb27
https://github.com/llvm
agozillon wrote:
I made a bit of a mistake not using SPR to land this PR series, so i've ended
up having to directly commit the PR, the associated commit for this PR can be
found here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/462435f089b7ca67ed1eed60f369e16b71e76b74
https://github.com/ll
agozillon wrote:
I made a bit of a mistake not using SPR to land this PR series, so i've ended
up having to directly commit the PR, the associated commit for this PR can be
found here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50df0ff515697090983b3cb951c48377bcfb6ddf
https://github.com/llvm
Author: Valentin Clement (バレンタイン クレメン)
Date: 2024-05-10T17:43:59-07:00
New Revision: 0f59bd6878dd97db4210ccfd9dd193ddfe7a50c6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f59bd6878dd97db4210ccfd9dd193ddfe7a50c6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f59bd6878dd97db4210ccfd9dd19
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91890
Backport 8c852ab57932
Requested by: @zyn0217
>From e45b88f445fdbc90c0ba40f31ef264ba8a20baa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 20:47:15 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Sema] Revis
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91890
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@zyn0217 What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91890
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 8c852ab57932
Requested by: @zyn0217
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91890.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp (+19-6)
- (modified) clang/test/Sem
https://github.com/llvmbot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91890
>From 7dcca34943097af1863f5a8718a41c888bedb682 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 20:47:15 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Sema] Revise the transformation of CTAD parameters of
nes
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt
Author: Amir Ayupov (aaupov)
Changes
Offset annotation was missed when optimizing an unconditional branch to
a tail call.
Test Plan: update bb-with-two-tail-calls.s
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91898.diff
2 Files Aff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt
Author: Amir Ayupov (aaupov)
Changes
Deleted basic blocks are required for correct mapping of branches
modified by SCTC.
Test Plan: updated bb-with-two-tail-calls.s
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91906.diff
4 Files Aff
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91917
Backport b5f4210e9f51f938ae517f219f04f9ab431a2684
Requested by: @dtcxzyw
>From e4bbaa67ac5bb4aa0c6a4699aaa164f58ab5ae61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yingwei Zheng
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 14:27:59 +0800
Subject
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91917
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@nikic What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91917
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport b5f4210e9f51f938ae517f219f04f9ab431a2684
Requested by: @dtcxzyw
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91917.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombin
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Michael Kruse (Meinersbur)
Changes
OpenMP loop transformation did not work on a for-loop using an iterator or
range-based for-loops. The first reason is that it combined the iterator's type
for generated
Author: Xiang Li
Date: 2024-05-13T08:58:36-04:00
New Revision: ec66d3931a3320cc21c278f94e6eeb815d4d274b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ec66d3931a3320cc21c278f94e6eeb815d4d274b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ec66d3931a3320cc21c278f94e6eeb815d4d274b.diff
LOG:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis
Author: Florian Hahn (fhahn)
Changes
Use SCEVUse to add a NUW flag to the upper bound of an accessed pointer.
We must already have proved that the pointers do not wrap, as otherwise
we could not use them for runtime check computations.
By
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis
Author: Florian Hahn (fhahn)
Changes
Use SCEVUse from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91961 to return a
SCEVUse with use-specific no-wrap flags for GEP expr, when demanded.
Clients need to opt-in, as the use-specific flags may n
Author: Schrodinger ZHU Yifan
Date: 2024-05-13T09:42:22-04:00
New Revision: ec88e86edd6a05bd902e844141a60686e9f9dbc4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ec88e86edd6a05bd902e844141a60686e9f9dbc4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ec88e86edd6a05bd902e844141a60686e9f9db
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91967
Backport 4b4763ffebaed9f1fee94b8ad5a1a450a9726683
Requested by: @tstellar
>From 16388668633f61f07b91eaaf9400810cbe19f326 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Reid Kleckner
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:10:53 -0800
Subjec
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91967
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 4b4763ffebaed9f1fee94b8ad5a1a450a9726683
Requested by: @tstellar
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91967.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lld/test/wasm/signature-mismatch.s (+1-1)
AtariDreams wrote:
> I wonder why CI doesn't flag this as an ABI-breaking change, given that it
> modifies members of a class in llvm/include.
If I had to guess it's because some of the padding between the bool element and
the smallvector is being used for the second bool.
https://github.com/
AtariDreams wrote:
So the offsets themselves aren't changing
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91092
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Daniel Thornburgh
Date: 2024-05-13T10:38:10-07:00
New Revision: 7a5f2fb7a1326108258eb614e278810ee84d4bf6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7a5f2fb7a1326108258eb614e278810ee84d4bf6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7a5f2fb7a1326108258eb614e278810ee84d4bf6.d
Author: Benoit Jacob
Date: 2024-05-13T13:43:40-04:00
New Revision: 32a4fd693ac0920cdf3410884494abfee6ac02d4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32a4fd693ac0920cdf3410884494abfee6ac02d4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32a4fd693ac0920cdf3410884494abfee6ac02d4.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt
Author: Amir Ayupov (aaupov)
Changes
Avoid name aliasing with llvm::bolt::BranchInfo, drop namespace
specifier.
Test Plan: NFC
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92017.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) bolt/include/bolt
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92049
Backport c99d1156c28dfed67a8479dd97608d1f0d6cd593
Requested by: @tstellar
>From a82ddb9d8122a2e73c8385d38147782dbdbbe0aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 16:31:21 -0700
Subject
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92049
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@tru What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92049
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/l
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-github-workflow
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport c99d1156c28dfed67a8479dd97608d1f0d6cd593
Requested by: @tstellar
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92049.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (added) .github/workflows/pr-request-rel
Author: Tom Stellard
Date: 2024-05-13T23:37:58Z
New Revision: a82ddb9d8122a2e73c8385d38147782dbdbbe0aa
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a82ddb9d8122a2e73c8385d38147782dbdbbe0aa
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a82ddb9d8122a2e73c8385d38147782dbdbbe0aa.diff
LOG:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Michael Kruse (Meinersbur)
Changes
Add the reverse and interchange directives which will be introduced in the
upcoming OpenMP 6.0 specification. A preview has been published in [Technical
Report 12](https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
Following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92083
The motivation is still cutting of the unnecessary change in the dependency
chain. See the above link (recursively) for details.
After t
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92129
Backport d422e90fcb68749918ddd86c94188807efce
Requested by: @DianQK
>From 273eaada783556afddbcbdbbf1b3399d73de5343 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Thorsten=20Sch=C3=BCtt?=
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 15
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92129
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@DianQK What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92129
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport d422e90fcb68749918ddd86c94188807efce
Requested by: @DianQK
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92129.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/GISel/A
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Craig Topper (topperc)
Changes
Backport 9067070d91e9d8cdd8509ffa56a076f08a3d7281 for #92134
---
Patch is 21.98 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92143.diff
21 Files Affe
AtariDreams wrote:
Fixed issue where incorrect code is generated on AArch64 when the source code
has multiple different comparisons with the same two values.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91151
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-bra
Author: GeorgeHuyubo
Date: 2024-05-14T14:35:56-07:00
New Revision: 38c358868dfb6d22c7e27032ad910c9f4e61092f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/38c358868dfb6d22c7e27032ad910c9f4e61092f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/38c358868dfb6d22c7e27032ad910c9f4e61092f.diff
Author: Mircea Trofin
Date: 2024-05-14T18:07:38-07:00
New Revision: 8d8432d158ca1cb8a138e1cee4d48f23ba9d4c64
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d8432d158ca1cb8a138e1cee4d48f23ba9d4c64
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d8432d158ca1cb8a138e1cee4d48f23ba9d4c64.diff
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92221
Backport d6ee7e8481fbaee30f37d82778ef12e135db5e67
Requested by: @nikic
>From 9dbc8e21ea0f27537c9183e8e1dc118338957654 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Paulsson
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 08:36:26 +0200
Subject:
llvmbot wrote:
@uweigand What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92221
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92221
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangleiat created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92223
The previous logic did not consider whether the architectural features
meet the requirements of the ABI, resulting in the generation of
incorrect object files in some cases. For example:
```
llc -mtriple=loonga
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-loongarch
Author: wanglei (wangleiat)
Changes
The previous logic did not consider whether the architectural features
meet the requirements of the ABI, resulting in the generation of
incorrect object files in some cases. For example:
```
llc -mtr
wangleiat wrote:
@xen0n
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92223
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangleiat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92223
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangleiat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92223
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Kamlesh Kumar
Date: 2024-05-15T18:21:25+05:30
New Revision: 57ac757310a6283e2a9cb8fdd01af3bc4535c055
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/57ac757310a6283e2a9cb8fdd01af3bc4535c055
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/57ac757310a6283e2a9cb8fdd01af3bc4535c055.diff
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92258
Backport d06270ee00e37b247eb99268fb2f106dbeee08ff
Requested by: @tstellar
>From 392149d03f1c2e9f6cd636d349a16494bf53caf2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 06:08:29 -0700
Subject
llvmbot wrote:
@boomanaiden154 What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92258
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92258
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-github-workflow
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport d06270ee00e37b247eb99268fb2f106dbeee08ff
Requested by: @tstellar
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92258.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) .github/workflows/libclang-ab
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92293
Backport be10746
Requested by: @Ericson2314
>From 5b09e6bf5aaeb21256e86455f8d6c42d01f71b95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Ericson
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 12:43:55 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Don't assume
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92293
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport be10746
Requested by: @Ericson2314
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92293.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/OpenBSD.cpp (+2-1)
``diff
diff
AtariDreams wrote:
> @AtariDreams I've noticed you've filed a lot of backport requests. How are
> you choosing which fixes to backport? Is there a specific use case you care
> about?
There a particular LLVM miscompile bug in WebKit I'm trying to figure out. It's
been there since 2019. Backpo
Author: Mehdi Amini
Date: 2024-05-15T15:05:04-07:00
New Revision: dffee4d14dc6c6dad97b060ea748116bd1c85d4b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dffee4d14dc6c6dad97b060ea748116bd1c85d4b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dffee4d14dc6c6dad97b060ea748116bd1c85d4b.diff
L
DianQK wrote:
> @DianQK (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
> the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
> one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
> release:note label to this PR.
Perhaps @
https://github.com/wangleiat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92223
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangleiat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92223
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangleiat created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92375
The 32 bits arguments and returns on LA64 are always sign extended to
i64. So we should be taking this into account around libcalls.
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing
https://github.com/wangleiat created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92376
None
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-loongarch
Author: wanglei (wangleiat)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92376.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/LoongArch/LoongArchISelLowering.cpp (+9)
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/LoongArch
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-loongarch
Author: wanglei (wangleiat)
Changes
The 32 bits arguments and returns on LA64 are always sign extended to
i64. So we should be taking this into account around libcalls.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92375.di
https://github.com/heiher approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92375
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/heiher approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92376
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
negge wrote:
I can confirm that bus error on unaligned vector access also happens on the
recently released Banana Pi BPI-F3 when using clang-18.1.5.
Note the BPI-F3 (https://docs.banana-pi.org/en/BPI-F3/BananaPi_BPI-F3) is a
different SOC from the K230 and right now these are the only two devi
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92468
Backport c79690040acf5bb3d857558b0878db47f7f23dc3
Requested by: @DianQK
>From 012e13b1594ba19058294d793993ad8da14c9159 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: DianQK
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 05:51:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92468
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@efriedma-quic What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92468
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport c79690040acf5bb3d857558b0878db47f7f23dc3
Requested by: @DianQK
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92468.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/GlobalO
DianQK wrote:
> As noted on the original pull request, this also affects some cases which
> might be safe to optimize (a weak alias where the aliasee is an internal
> symbol with no other references). But "optimizing" those cases doesn't really
> have any useful effect, anyway: it doesn't unbl
DianQK wrote:
Release note (maybe):
Do not replace an aliasee with an alias that has weak linkage, as this prevents
the selection of incorrect symbols during the linking time.
@tstellar
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92468
___
llvm-branch
DianQK wrote:
Per https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91483#issuecomment-2116394616, we
still need to further investigate this issue, but it won't stop us from
backporting it.
cc @MaskRay
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92468
___
ll
https://github.com/wangleiat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92375
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangleiat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92375
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangleiat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92376
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/wangleiat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92376
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/AtariDreams created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92478
When -ObjC is passed, the linker must force load any object files that contain
special sections that store Objective-C / Swift information that is used at
runtime.
This should work regadless if input files
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92478
>From 8c9c7a49a36eccaca8867b2535988cf12ba6b41d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nuri Amari
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 09:21:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lld] Fix -ObjC load behavior with LTO (#92162)
When -ObjC is p
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-macho
Author: AtariDreams (AtariDreams)
Changes
When -ObjC is passed, the linker must force load any object files that contain
special sections that store Objective-C / Swift information that is used at
runtime.
This should work regadless if input
https://github.com/AtariDreams created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92479
This was looking through an addrspacecast, and not finding a later unfoldable
cast to another address space. Fixes improperly deleting a required alloca +
memcpy and introducing an illegal addrspacecast.
Th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: AtariDreams (AtariDreams)
Changes
This was looking through an addrspacecast, and not finding a later unfoldable
cast to another address space. Fixes improperly deleting a required alloca +
memcpy and introducing an illegal addrs
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2024-05-16T19:58:44-07:00
New Revision: ebb9f82e4c6f9b7c6f627da71ffbfb858f655d1e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ebb9f82e4c6f9b7c6f627da71ffbfb858f655d1e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ebb9f82e4c6f9b7c6f627da71ffbfb858f655d1e.d
RichardLuo0 wrote:
> Is there a similar change that is proposed for the main branch?
Yes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91240, I forget to mention that
here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91182
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing l
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Igor Kudrin (igorkudrin)
Changes
`AArch64PAuth::checkAuthenticatedRegister()` splits the basic block containing
the tail call instruction to add check instructions, assuming at least one more
instruction before the call. This as
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
Following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92085.
motivation
The motivation is still cutting of the unnecessary change in the dependency
chain. See the above link (recursively) fo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-openmp
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak)
Changes
Currently, OpenMP operations are defined independently of each other. However,
one property of the OpenMP specification is that many clauses can be applied to
multiple const
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-openmp
Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak)
Changes
This patch adds a new tablegen file for the OpenMP dialect containing the list
of clauses currently supported.
---
Patch is 44.02 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak)
Changes
This patch adds a new tablegen file for the OpenMP dialect containing the list
of clauses currently supported.
---
Patch is 44.02 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/ll
3301 - 3400 of 62376 matches
Mail list logo