[llvm-bugs] [Bug 36423] r324100 breaks lld on OpenBSD
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36423 Hans Wennborgchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Hans Wennborg --- Sorry, I hadn't seen that there was follow-up discussion (for reference, this is on the D42825 mailing list thread). We're too late in the 6.0.0 process to mess around with this. In r325759 I've reverted the branch back to where we were at branch point, i.e. the flag is spelled the same as in lld 5.0.1. Future changes can be done on trunk and shipped in lld 7. (As a parenthesis to the discussion, note that Clang also supports the -nopie spelling, and passing it along spelled like that to the linker on OpenBSD.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ llvm-bugs mailing list llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
[llvm-bugs] [Bug 36423] r324100 breaks lld on OpenBSD
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36423 Rui Ueyamachanged: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #3 from Rui Ueyama --- Apologies, I didn't notice this bug before. But I think I have to revert that change because I'm not convinced that that's a bug. Actually in the thread, most people seems to be in agreement that lld shouldn't accept -nopie. Brad, you said that just "No" when I asked if you could change OpenBSD instead of lld. But just saying no isn't enough to convince us to make lld compatible with OpenBSD-local extensions for the obvious reason. Please join to the discussion thread again if you still think that lld should accept "-nopie". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ llvm-bugs mailing list llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
[llvm-bugs] [Bug 36423] r324100 breaks lld on OpenBSD
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36423 Hans Wennborgchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Hans Wennborg --- Turns out this is just gold and OpenBSD's ld spelling the option differently. I've added an alias in r325679 and merged that to 6.0 in r325680. Brad, please re-open if there are still issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ llvm-bugs mailing list llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs