https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41065
Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Fixed By Commit(s)| |r356425
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> ---
r356425 should fix this. Instead of doing as suggested and emitting the
destructor, the fix was to not reference it, because derived2_class is
abstract, and the call to destroy derived_class was actually dead. We don't
have to construct it or destroy virtual bases of abstract classes. r356425
implements that optimization.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
