Hi Dale,
Looks like there is some desynchronization here now:
+ } else if (TREE_CODE(Type) == INTEGER_TYPE || \
+ TREE_CODE(Type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE) {\
Shouldn't be POINTER_TYPE here also?
+if (TREE_CODE(ArgTy) == INTEGER_TYPE ||
On Feb 5, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
Hi Dale,
Looks like there is some desynchronization here now:
+ } else if (TREE_CODE(Type) == INTEGER_TYPE || \
+ TREE_CODE(Type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE) {\
Shouldn't be POINTER_TYPE here also?
On Feb 5, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
Hi Dale,
Looks like there is some desynchronization here now:
+ } else if (TREE_CODE(Type) == INTEGER_TYPE || \
+ TREE_CODE(Type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE) {