Author: void
Date: Sun Feb 10 02:10:24 2008
New Revision: 46922
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46922view=rev
Log:
Return (c1 + c2) instead of yet another ADD node (which made this a
no-op).
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
Modified:
Author: lattner
Date: Sun Feb 10 02:17:19 2008
New Revision: 46923
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46923view=rev
Log:
final set of major updates
Modified:
llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
URL:
Author: lattner
Date: Sun Feb 10 02:18:42 2008
New Revision: 46924
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46924view=rev
Log:
validation fixes
Modified:
llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
URL:
Author: wmat
Date: Sun Feb 10 04:41:01 2008
New Revision: 46927
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46927view=rev
Log:
Revert commits: r46886, r46860, r46858. Restore proper working of -emit-llvm
and --emit-llvm options on, at
least, Linux/x86.
Modified:
Author: baldrick
Date: Sun Feb 10 07:40:55 2008
New Revision: 46928
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46928view=rev
Log:
Add some Ada info and correct a few buglets.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
URL:
Author: lattner
Date: Sun Feb 10 11:52:05 2008
New Revision: 46929
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46929view=rev
Log:
close an li tag
Modified:
llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
URL:
Changes in directory llvm-www:
www-index.html updated: 1.151 - 1.152
---
Log message:
link to all the tutorials.
---
Diffs of the changes: (+2 -2)
www-index.html |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: llvm-www/www-index.html
diff -u
Author: sampo
Date: Sun Feb 10 12:47:57 2008
New Revision: 46931
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46931view=rev
Log:
xmm0 variable blends
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrSSE.td
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrSSE.td
URL:
On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Sam Bishop wrote:
I have been working my way through the JIT and Kaleidoscope
tutorials in my
(minuscule) spare time. Thanks again for writing them! I have
attached a
patch containing some minor changes, ranging from spelling and
grammar fixes
to
On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:45 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
Hi Chris,
Fix arg promotion to propagate the correct attrs on the calls to
promoted functions. This is important for varargs calls in
particular. Thanks to duncan for providing a great testcase.
you forgot about attributes on the function
On Feb 10, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Dan Gohman wrote:
Author: djg
Date: Sun Feb 10 12:45:23 2008
New Revision: 46930
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46930view=rev
Log:
Rename MRegisterInfo to TargetRegisterInfo.
Whoa, excellent! We've needed this for a long time,
-Chris
Author: lattner
Date: Sun Feb 10 13:05:37 2008
New Revision: 46932
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46932view=rev
Log:
Fix scalarrepl to not 'miscompile' undefined code, part #2.
This fixes the store case, my previous patch just fixed the load
case. rdar://5707076.
Modified:
Author: lattner
Date: Sun Feb 10 13:11:04 2008
New Revision: 46933
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46933view=rev
Log:
Various updates from Sam Bishop:
I have been working my way through the JIT and Kaleidoscope tutorials in my
(minuscule) spare time. Thanks again for writing them!
On Feb 6, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Dan Gohman wrote:
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46827view=rev
Log:
Create a new class, MemOperand, for describing memory references
in the backend. Introduce a new SDNode type, MemOperandSDNode, for
holding a MemOperand in the SelectionDAG IR, and
you forgot about attributes on the function return value.
I've lost the context for this, do you remember what this was about?
I fixed it for you already :)
D.
___
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
On Feb 10, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
you forgot about attributes on the function return value.
I've lost the context for this, do you remember what this was about?
I fixed it for you already :)
Ahh, thanks :) :)
-Chris
___
maybe c380004 can be hyperlinked too?
There's not really much point: this is not an llvm-gcc problem.
I don't plan to open a PR for it, so there's nothing to link to.
Ciao,
Duncan.
___
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Author: ggreif
Date: Sun Feb 10 14:08:16 2008
New Revision: 46934
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46934view=rev
Log:
corrected some spellings
maybe c380004 can be hyperlinked too?
Modified:
llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
URL:
On Feb 6, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Dan Gohman wrote:
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46827view=rev
Log:
Re-apply the memory operand changes, with a fix for the static
initializer problem, a minor tweak to the way the
DAGISelEmitter finds load/store nodes, and a renaming of the
new
On Feb 9, 2008, at 9:26 AM, Wojciech Matyjewicz wrote:
Hi,
I've attached an updated version of the patch. It is ready for using
support for APInts in the code generator, but currently it doesn't
rely
on this feature. I've added a hack that rounds up the computation
bitwidth to power of
Chris Lattner wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008, at 9:26 AM, Wojciech Matyjewicz wrote:
Hi,
I've attached an updated version of the patch. It is ready for using
support for APInts in the code generator, but currently it doesn't
rely
on this feature. I've added a hack that rounds up the computation
Nick Lewycky wrote:
Just one question,
+ const IntegerType *ExTy = IntegerType::get(std::max(DividendBits, 32U));
why the max of DividendBits and 32? If for whatever reason we think we
need only 16 bits for the computation, why expand it to 32?
We compute the divisor of the BC formula
Wojciech Matyjewicz wrote:
Nick Lewycky wrote:
Just one question,
+ const IntegerType *ExTy = IntegerType::get(std::max(DividendBits, 32U));
why the max of DividendBits and 32? If for whatever reason we think we
need only 16 bits for the computation, why expand it to 32?
We compute the
Any idea what the differences mean? .rodata.cst4 makes it possible to
be merged? Was there a reason to change it or than to match gcc?
Thanks,
Evan
On Feb 9, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote:
Author: nicholas
Date: Sat Feb 9 18:03:54 2008
New Revision: 46916
URL:
What is this fixing? I would expect SelectionDAG to constant
evaluating it to a constant node?
Evan
On Feb 10, 2008, at 12:10 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
Author: void
Date: Sun Feb 10 02:10:24 2008
New Revision: 46922
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46922view=rev
Log:
Return
Author: lattner
Date: Mon Feb 11 01:27:21 2008
New Revision: 46952
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46952view=rev
Log:
tweaks from dale.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
URL:
On Feb 9, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Duncan Sands wrote:
the current LLVM implementation means that anyone using threading
needs
to not do bitfield accesses, since the compiler generated code could
cause trouble.
This is not handled by LLVM, this is handled by FE that is translating
source code
27 matches
Mail list logo
