[llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc-4.2] r43887 - in /llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk: boehm-gc/ libffi/ libjava/ libmudflap/ libobjc/ libssp/ zlib/

2007-11-08 Thread Bill Wendling
Author: void Date: Thu Nov 8 03:11:48 2007 New Revision: 43887 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=43887view=rev Log: Removing libraries to sync with Apple GCC 4.2. Removed: llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/boehm-gc/ llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/libffi/ llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/libjava/

Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc-4.2] r43887 - in /llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk: boehm-gc/ libffi/ libjava/ libmudflap/ libobjc/ libssp/ zlib/

2007-11-08 Thread Anton Korobeynikov
Bill, llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/libobjc/ I expect, that nobody will use objc fe on non-darwin, but anyway - why removing libobjc (and not just excluding from build)? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc-4.2] r43887 - in /llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk: boehm-gc/ libffi/ libjava/ libmudflap/ libobjc/ libssp/ zlib/

2007-11-08 Thread Bill Wendling
Hi Anton, llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/libobjc/ I expect, that nobody will use objc fe on non-darwin, but anyway - why removing libobjc (and not just excluding from build)? Good question. Right now, I'm just trying to sync our tree with what's in Apple GCC 4.2's TOT. My guess is that if we don't

Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc-4.2] r43887 - in /llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk: boehm-gc/ libffi/ libjava/ libmudflap/ libobjc/ libssp/ zlib/

2007-11-08 Thread Eric Christopher
On Nov 8, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: Hi Anton, llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/libobjc/ I expect, that nobody will use objc fe on non-darwin, but anyway - why removing libobjc (and not just excluding from build)? Good question. Right now, I'm just trying to sync our tree with what's

Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc-4.2] r43887 - in /llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk: boehm-gc/ libffi/ libjava/ libmudflap/ libobjc/ libssp/ zlib/

2007-11-08 Thread Chris Lattner
On Nov 8, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: Hi Anton, llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/libobjc/ I expect, that nobody will use objc fe on non-darwin, but anyway - why removing libobjc (and not just excluding from build)? Good question. Right now, I'm just trying to sync our tree with

Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc-4.2] r43887 - in /llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk: boehm-gc/ libffi/ libjava/ libmudflap/ libobjc/ libssp/ zlib/

2007-11-08 Thread Bill Wendling
Please follow the model of libstdc++. Instead of deleting them, just make them not build on darwin (like libstdc++). Totally made it so. :-) -bw ___ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu