Hello, Bill.
+// ASM variant to use.
+enum {
+ X86_ATT = 0,
+ X86_INTEL = 1
+};
There is already assembler flavour defined in Subtarget. Why do you need
some more?
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
Hello, Bill.
+// ASM variant to use.
+enum {
+ X86_ATT = 0,
+ X86_INTEL = 1
+};
There is already assembler flavour defined in Subtarget. Why do you
need
some more?
Hmm...Good question. It should use this information to at
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Target/X86:
X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp updated: 1.25 - 1.26
X86TargetAsmInfo.h updated: 1.3 - 1.4
---
Log message:
Fix for PR1095: http://llvm.org/PR1095 :
LLVM would miscompile ASM dialects when compiling for PPC. Added dialects for
the X86 and PPC backends. It
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Target/X86:
X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp updated: 1.9 - 1.10
X86TargetAsmInfo.h updated: 1.2 - 1.3
---
Log message:
Trivially lower 'bswap $0' into llvm.bswap. This fixes hexxagon with the
JIT on darwin/x86, which has htonl implemented as inline asm.
---
Diffs of the
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Target/X86:
X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp added (r1.1)
X86TargetAsmInfo.h added (r1.1)
---
Log message:
Break out target asm info into separate files.
---
Diffs of the changes: (+126 -0)
X86TargetAsmInfo.cpp | 95 +++
