Im seeing alot of other daws going that way. Even the dj software i use has
gone that way. even FL allows you to do that too.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> I know quite a few who would love to see LMMS better as live program.
> Controlling by wifi sounds more like a
On 04/02/2014 03:22 AM, midi-pascal wrote:
>
> On 69-12-31 07:00 PM, wrote:
>> On 04/01/2014 09:00 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
>> I like the first idea. The second really only apply for Sf2 drums :-)
>> Could be implemented if it is simple, but I can understand that it
>> might overload LMMS too.
>
On 69-12-31 07:00 PM, wrote:
On 04/01/2014 09:00 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
I like the first idea. The second really only apply for Sf2 drums :-)
Could be implemented if it is simple, but I can understand that it
might overload LMMS too.
For SF2 it might actually be more difficult, since SF
@Toby,
For now I've omitted the questionable CMAKE_INSTALL_NAME_DIR change as I
seem to be able to work-around the linking issues without it.
> https://github.com/tresf/lmms/compare/LMMS:stable-1.0...stable-1.0
I'm still tweaking the packaging scripts, so I'll wait a few days before
doing a pull
On 04/01/2014 10:17 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> 2014-03-31 12:29 GMT+02:00 Raine M. Ekman :
>> I was under the impression that the instrument fx chains work per note
>> already?
> No, all sounds rendered for all notes get mixed into the instrument's
> AudioPort. Later FX processing is done *once*
I am really into democracy right now, so the way I think it should be done
with the demo songs is a combination of voting and judges. Judges pick out
some songs (to make sure the songs are good and shows a variety of LMMS'
functions) and then the community vote on those they think should be
include
2014-03-31 12:29 GMT+02:00 Raine M. Ekman :
> I was under the impression that the instrument fx chains work per note
> already?
No, all sounds rendered for all notes get mixed into the instrument's
AudioPort. Later FX processing is done *once* for the AudioPort
buffer.
> I don't entirely buy the
> If your Windows/Linux run Portuguese language LMMS will use Portuguese,
> I think.
There's an outstanding effort to ad localization support. I'm not sure how
far along this is, but requires the contributions of the mutilingual
members of our community. We need to make a Wiki for it, which I'd
On 04/01/2014 09:00 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> I like the first idea. The second really only apply for Sf2 drums :-) Could
> be implemented if it is simple, but I can understand that it might overload
> LMMS too.
For SF2 it might actually be more difficult, since SF2 is a MIDI-based
plugin that
If your Windows/Linux run Portuguese language LMMS will use Portuguese, I
think.
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-in-portuguese-language-tp7614p7639.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
I like the first idea. The second really only apply for Sf2 drums :-) Could
be implemented if it is simple, but I can understand that it might overload
LMMS too.
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Tracks-split-merge-tp7612p7638.html
Sent fr
I know quite a few who would love to see LMMS better as live program.
Controlling by wifi sounds more like a gimmick than useful. I mean, if you
can control LMMS with your PC, you can control it with anything with some
coding, but why...
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-
On 04/01/2014 06:36 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> How come the presets dont get bundled with lmms?
They do.
--
___
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http
Click the star. Jonathan, are we talking about the same thing?
[image: Inline image 1]
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
> How come the presets dont get bundled with lmms?
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Vesa wrote:
>
>> On 04/01/2
How come the presets dont get bundled with lmms?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 04/01/2014 01:30 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > Speaking of presets, Could we offer presets as part of lmms? Reason
> > being is we have a folder called templates which could be renamed
> > templ
On 04/01/2014 01:30 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Speaking of presets, Could we offer presets as part of lmms? Reason
> being is we have a folder called templates which could be renamed
> template/presets and we put them in there. I think having presets
> would really help with creativity as well
> In AutomatableModel::setAutomatedValue, there are now:
>
> log_to_linear_scale() // my new function
> fittedValue()
>
> I am not sure what "!(*it)->fittedValue( m_value )" should look like now,
> since my log conversion is done before the fittedValue() call. I wonder if
> this check is even
Speaking of presets, Could we offer presets as part of lmms? Reason being
is we have a folder called templates which could be renamed
template/presets and we put them in there. I think having presets would
really help with creativity as well as share that creativity with the
community.
On Mon, Ma
The way things are worded it mentions app store which is mac only, plus it
seems to work with wifi only which i find to be a bit limiting. We would
need to work with upstream to get bluetooth supported.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
> Oops, the message was totally meant
Oops, the message was totally meant for the list...
I don't think there's anything mac specific about a (I think)
text-based protocol transferred over network sockets. There are
implementations on Linux.
And of course a LMMS-specific controller from the ground up is still
totally possible w
Very valid point. BTW you only sent this to me. From what Im seeing this
seems to be very mac specific or is that not a correct assumption to make?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
>
> I guess that's one way to go. Why use a standard that's used by a lot of
> other (soft|ha
This is just an FYI for everyone on debian/ubuntu derivatives you can do
apt-get build-dep and that should pull in all you need to get building lmms
from source.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:27 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 1 April 2014 08:11, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>
> > Are you using Israel's P
On 1 April 2014 08:11, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Are you using Israel's PPA? Or the other PPA that i know there is if that is
> the case I think that the packages in the PPA need to be updated to have
> fluid pulled in as a dependency.
I'm compiling from source, pulled from github, as I said.
Are you using Israel's PPA? Or the other PPA that i know there is if that
is the case I think that the packages in the PPA need to be updated to have
fluid pulled in as a dependency.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:07 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 1 April 2014 06:33, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>
> > I a
On 1 April 2014 06:33, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I am a bit suprised you had to install fluid seperatly, and that it wasnt
> pulled in as a dependency during install of the deb package.
I haven't installed it from the distro since 0.4.15 in 13.10, since
then I've been building from source and
25 matches
Mail list logo
