Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

On 04/30/2014 09:15 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi, > > it's a good chance for the SRU as Israel (or whoever ;-) can use the > official 1.0.1 source tarball without having the versioning issues > with 1.0.0. However I don't know when things will be ready. IMHO you > can still post it on FB in the

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

> Anyway I tried it on a non-LADSPA knob - the setLogarithmic function in > automatablemodel - and it doesn't seem to have any effect... You probably mean AutomatableModel::setScaleLogarithmic(bool) ? This is actually the way it should be done when it's not handled by LADSPA. You won't see much

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

> > Were there any problems with the patch, or did you turn it off for some > > reason? > > No, I didn't change anything. Ouch, I was in an old fork of lmms. It works, and the model linking works fine aswell. Only the automation editor displays the frequency still linear now (below the mouse cu

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

On 04/30/2014 11:40 PM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: >> No you're misunderstanding me. The knob itself can't "guess" it, we'd >> need code in whatever code is using the knob to define the knob as a >> "logarithmic" knob. LADSPA plugin has code for "guessing" when a knob is >> logarithmic, but the LADSPA

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

> No you're misunderstanding me. The knob itself can't "guess" it, we'd > need code in whatever code is using the knob to define the knob as a > "logarithmic" knob. LADSPA plugin has code for "guessing" when a knob is > logarithmic, but the LADSPA plugin host itself would then need to define > thos

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

Hi, 2014-04-30 20:10 GMT+02:00 Johannes Lorenz : > Were there any problems with the patch, or did you turn it off for some > reason? No, I didn't change anything. Toby -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Brow

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

> > I tried the current master branch today, but the logscale behaviour does > > not seem to be working (it's still linear). Though the patch's code is > > actually in. > > Doesn't it need to be turned on in the individual knobs? I don't think > it should make all the knobs everywhere logarithmic.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

On 04/30/2014 09:10 PM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: > Hi, > >> LMMS 1.0.1 just has been released > Thanks first of all! > > I tried the current master branch today, but the logscale behaviour does not > seem to be working (it's still linear). Though the patch's code is actually > in. Doesn't it need

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

Hi, > LMMS 1.0.1 just has been released Thanks first of all! I tried the current master branch today, but the logscale behaviour does not seem to be working (it's still linear). Though the patch's code is actually in. Were there any problems with the patch, or did you turn it off for some rea

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

Hi, it's a good chance for the SRU as Israel (or whoever ;-) can use the official 1.0.1 source tarball without having the versioning issues with 1.0.0. However I don't know when things will be ready. IMHO you can still post it on FB in the meanwhile. Thanks Toby

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

Will Ubuntu have to wait a long time on this one too? I feel bad when posting to FB that a new version is out, but not for Ubuntu :/ -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-0-1-tp8513p8515.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archiv

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

Well that's freaking surprising -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-0-1-tp8513p8514.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- "Acc

[LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

Hi, LMMS 1.0.1 just has been released - see https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/releases/tag/v1.0.1 for details. Files can be downloaded at https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmms/files/lmms/1.0.1/ Toby -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

Scratch that... They're all there and linked properly. I was looking in the wrong directory. So building/installing is just fine. This issue is the same as the STK RawWave issue where I need to adjust the Default Path. Will correct for Apple and submit a patch now

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

Note that the "Free Tier" on AWS is only offered for the first 12 months. 2014-04-30 4:28 GMT+02:00 Tres Finocchiaro : > So I'm looking into a proper cloud storage for "collaborato" :) and I've > come across a few options (please list any/all others). > >- *Google Cloud Storage* >- *Amaz

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

Toby, This is something that I think should not be rushed. I think this feature for 2.0 does seam reasonable. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > 2014-04-29 20:41 GMT+02:00 Vesa : > > So.. How would this work in practice? Do you mean that the sidebar tabs > > would be con