Can't we do both and just have them redirect to one site that sounds better?
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Top-Level-Domain-Final-decision-tp9607p9997.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
This is an awesome post. Thank you for taking the time to write this out!
I'm really impressed with the depth in which you've analyzed this! Thanks
for your work Vesa.
Kind regards,
Sam Duff
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Vesa wrote:
> So, while we figure out a way to get a new RT-safe eng
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juhana Sadeharju
Date: 2014-08-13 4:00 GMT+02:00
Subject: LMMS/physical modelling synth?
To: toby...@users.sourceforge.net
Hello. I'm wishing for physical modelling synth within LMMS.
Some years ago a guy demoed a flute patch in music-dsp.
The patch
So, while we figure out a way to get a new RT-safe engine implanted into
LMMS (maybe Unison, maybe something else), and we have plans for
kickstarters and all that which is still a good idea, but meanwhile,
I've also been working on figuring out the possibilities for improving
the current engine. C
Ok, the RC4 has been released. (I think it's 4? I mean, if we start
counting the version tags from .90, .91, .92, .93...)
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/releases/tag/v1.0.93
Tres, can you please build the windows builds and add them to the above
release page? I've added you to the CoreDev group so
