Hi all,
I have contacted a few MOTU to try to get 1.0.0 SRU'd in Ubuntu 14.04,
but have not had any success.
I may end up sending an e-mail to every single MOTU and see who answers :)
Unfortunately, the SRU team is so overwhelmed, and feature freeze is
happening for 14.10 in a couple days.
I have
On Aug 19, 2014 11:11 AM, "Jonathan Aquilina"
wrote:
>
> Would it be worth the effort to get the unit tests integrated from now or
wait until qt5. All I can say is that it will help improve overall code
quality and find any issues during the development cycle
@Jonathan,
You are dodging responsib
On 08/19/2014 06:37 PM, HDDigitizerMusic wrote:
> @Musicbear
>
> I use ZynAddSubFX. You can pretty much do anything with that program. Its
> just a tough one to learn.
Anything? Hardly... in some ways, Zyn is frustratingly limited.
-
@Musicbear
I use ZynAddSubFX. You can pretty much do anything with that program. Its
just a tough one to learn.
Also, the risers we have in the FX area of the new library were crated in FL
Studio by a producer named Deficio. :)
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-l
On 08/19/2014 05:57 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> QtTest is available since at least Qt 4. Regarding Qt 5 I'd propose to
> drop Qt 4 support with version 2.0 next year - Qt 5 should be very
> common then.
>
Hmm, AFAIK Qt5 isn't available in Ubuntu 12.04 repositories, which is
something that many pe
Would it be worth the effort to get the unit tests integrated from now or
wait until qt5. All I can say is that it will help improve overall code
quality and find any issues during the development cycle
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Tobias Doerffel
wrote:
> QtTest is available since at least
QtTest is available since at least Qt 4. Regarding Qt 5 I'd propose to
drop Qt 4 support with version 2.0 next year - Qt 5 should be very
common then.
Toby
--
___
LMMS-devel mai
I think the decision thats goign to need to be made is if we are not ready
to migrate to qt5 and the test suite isnt available for qt4. would it be
worth it using an external unit test framework.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Vesa wrote:
> On 08/18/2014 07:12 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> > I
On Aug 19, 2014 8:21 AM, "musikbear" wrote:
>
> Tres Finocchiaro wrote
> > That is exactly what I was looking for, thank you.
>
> Good, but then what - Are there any list of issues that has been attempted
> to fix between 0.92 and now 0.93?
> It would be a really good idea with such a /RCn to RCn+
Tres Finocchiaro wrote
> That is exactly what I was looking for, thank you.
Good, but then what - Are there any list of issues that has been attempted
to fix between 0.92 and now 0.93?
It would be a really good idea with such a /RCn to RCn+1-change-list/ -or?
I can go through the motion, though -
HDDigitizerMusic wrote
> Yes, we have FX covered.
Super :)
@tresf - yes lmms need something to actually generate 'non-musical' sounds!
srFx is a good first attemt to add a generator for exactly that, and it can
in fact make very interesting sounds! But something 'advanced' -a real
dedicated unit,
On 19.08.2014 09:10, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>
> Please uninstall prior. It reuses old registry settings during
> install. IT WILL HAVE PROBLEMS if you don't uninstall first. This
> problem is all too common
>
> Uninstall old versions first.
>
> Uninstall old versions first.
>
> Uninstall ol
12 matches
Mail list logo
