On 09/24/2014 12:00 AM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> About the tempo-track idea. Global automation of the tempo is the same,
No. The entire point of tempo track is that there is one place and one
place only where tempo can be automated. So that we can easily look up
the tempo at any point in time.
About the tempo-track idea. Global automation of the tempo is the same,
starts at bar 1 in the song, only that it does not show up in the Song
Editor?
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Let-s-rethink-automation-tracks-tp10416p10446.html
Sen
On 09/23/2014 10:46 PM, HDDigitizerMusic wrote:
> Just a thought, not sure if this is too hard or not but, this might be good
> as a feature you can enable and disable in the settings area.
Nope, not going to happen...
-
I find the current automation tracks pretty useful to me. If you right click
them, you can see what they're connected to under a drop down list. The only
problem with that is it only says stuff like "Reverb>wet/dry" which would be
nice to have clarification like "(Name of instrument)>Reverb>wet/dry
On 09/23/2014 03:17 PM, Israel wrote:
> Hi Everyone, this is good news!
>
> Timo is a MOTU we can contact!!!
> Yay!! Now we have someone who we can talk to directly!
> This is REALLY good news
Cool, better late than never ;)
>
> Why dont we push 1.1 to universe?
>
Why don't you spend more time helping and less time asking questions.
mainly I had to update the changelog in a different way, and other minor
> issues.
@Israel,
If there is every anything you find that could benefit by being upstream
(in our code) to ma
Why dont we push 1.1 to universe?
On 23 Sep 2014 14:18, "Israel" wrote:
> Hi Everyone, this is good news!
>
> Timo is a MOTU we can contact!!!
> Yay!! Now we have someone who we can talk to directly!
> This is REALLY good news
>
> Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Another LMMS q
Hi Tres,
It is most embarrassing for me, but I learned a lot from that experience.
He accepted it, but we still have to wait for it to become approved by
the SRU team.
We didn't have a MOTU to even accept lmms to be considered, I e-mailed a
few MOTU from a list, but no one responded :(
This also me
Great news. So he finally accepted 1.0.0, but we're on 1.0.3 and ready for
1.1.0 :)
Glad to know someone is finally listening, this botched 1.0.0 is quite
embarrassing.
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Israel wrote:
> Hi Everyone, this is good news!
>
> Ti
Hi Everyone, this is good news!
Timo is a MOTU we can contact!!!
Yay!! Now we have someone who we can talk to directly!
This is REALLY good news
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Another LMMS question
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:44:27 +0300
From: Timo Jyrinki
To: Isr
10 matches
Mail list logo
