Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS saves backup of presets

Wait I didn't understand... Doesn't it save the old version? Il 08/12/2014 21:56, Stian Jørgensrud ha scritto: > Well, I can say that the function is broken if it was intended. It only saves > backups of presets when I click save... What is the purpose of a backup > then? Preventing fucking up wh

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS saves backup of presets

Well, I can say that the function is broken if it was intended. It only saves backups of presets when I click save... What is the purpose of a backup then? Preventing fucking up when saving? DeRobyJ (giakkaHotmail surrogate) wrote > Of course it is intended. Even if it isn't, it's fantastic. I sh

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS saves backup of presets

Of course it is intended. Even if it isn't, it's fantastic. I should use exclamation marks. Il 08/12/2014 19:39, Stian Jørgensrud ha scritto: > But is it intended > > Should it do that > > Should I add questionmarks > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmm

[LMMS-devel] LMMS saves backup of presets

But is it intended Should it do that Should I add questionmarks -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-saves-backup-of-presets-tp11139.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] Weird Master channel with some clicks

I'm sorry, but could someone else confirm this visual bug? Because I remember putting general volume up and having no problem in one of my early projects, while now I seem to have this bug in all 1.1 versions. It's like something is wrong with my system .-. To reproduce: - Create new project -

Re: [LMMS-devel] Let's rethink automation tracks

Maybe one could allow automation to change all linked knobs instead. Stian Jørgensrud wrote > I just found out LMMS supports MIDI automation after all, for volume, pan > and pitch at least. Now, in the file I got all the instrument's pan and > volume knobs were connected to one automation track.

Re: [LMMS-devel] ... does *this* looks a little (too) familiar?

> > > why can't they just contribute to the existing ones (I know this guy > want to make money). A bit of topic, but anyone can make money off of LMMS if they wish. :) GPL only guarantees the source code is free. It is completely within someone's rights to sell the software and if a commercial

Re: [LMMS-devel] ... does *this* looks a little (too) familiar?

Lol, I consider LMMS to be better than that DAW at many points. God, why are everyone making their own DAW, why can't they just contribute to the existing ones (I know this guy want to make money). -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/does-th

Re: [LMMS-devel] ... does *this* looks a little (too) familiar?

On 12/08/2014 06:01 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > That appears to be a nice DAW and although it bares some visual > similarities to LMMS, More likely, it bears visual similarities to FL Studio... just like LMMS. Our tabbed instrument windows, song editor, bb-editor, Fx-mixer, are all just renamed

Re: [LMMS-devel] ... does *this* looks a little (too) familiar?

That appears to be a nice DAW and although it bares some visual similarities to LMMS, this conversation is probably better left for the forums. If you demo version 4 and feel strongly that it may be in violation of our GPL, please do let us know, however, from the marketing material you have linke

[LMMS-devel] ... does *this* looks a little (too) familiar?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OStEicKvOm8 scrol to 4:05 Is /this/ ..seen before? Can that be proven? -and then what? -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/does-this-looks-a-little-too-familiar-tp11132.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing li

Re: [LMMS-devel] which branch of the git repo to pull.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Yosemite > Terrific! Please open a bug report if you encounter any issues. We've never built for that so we're likely to encounter more Clang issues! :) -Tres ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] which branch of the git repo to pull.

Yosemite On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > I have all dependencies setup on my new mac, but I am wondering which > branch to fork. Should i fork master or in terms of mac related bugs always > the latest stable branch? > > Jonathan, are you building on Mavericks or Yose

Re: [LMMS-devel] which branch of the git repo to pull.

> I have all dependencies setup on my new mac, but I am wondering which branch to fork. Should i fork master or in terms of mac related bugs always the latest stable branch? Jonathan, are you building on Mavericks or Yosemite? P.S. we just patched stable-1.1 for Apple

Re: [LMMS-devel] Weird Master channel with some clicks

Thanks. If this is reproducible, please file a bug and if it's new with the 1.1 branch, we'll label it as such. It sounds similar to #1048 but we can always mark as duplicate if we determine it's the same bug. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Sun