>
> -btw, How many has participated uptill now?
There are 92 responses so far, I'll see to make some graphs in the next few
days.
-Uroš|Umcaruje
On 6 February 2015 at 13:31, musikbear wrote:
> good job -Do say when you have 'results'
> -btw, How many has participated uptill now?
>
>
>
> --
>
good job -Do say when you have 'results'
-btw, How many has participated uptill now?
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Conducting-a-survey-for-LMMS-tp11568p11581.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Aaand, of course this survey is just for the fun of it! No obligations are
being made. Now I'll go ice skating, yay!
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Conducting-a-survey-for-LMMS-tp11568p11578.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list ar
musikbear wrote
> "What in current 1.1 do you have most aggrevation/ trouble/ grief/ from?"
They tell us that everywhere... forum, github, facebook, google plus. I
think this survey is more general anyway, not necessarily only for LMMS 1.1.
The link was so you could view how it looks like.
--
V
Dave French wrote
> I've only just noticed the link to the survey, nicely done :)
whut - has you gone live with this already? (see no link though) i hope
not..
One thing that i would love to hear from users would be
"What in current 1.1 do you have most aggrevation/ trouble/ grief/ from?"
--
I've only just noticed the link to the survey, nicely done :)
On 2 February 2015 at 10:46, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> Dave French wrote
> > Them questions of mine were only suggestions, I'm cool with deciding not
> > to
> > use some of them,
>
> Neat! I'll get someone to spell check this form, an
Dave French wrote
> Them questions of mine were only suggestions, I'm cool with deciding not
> to
> use some of them,
Neat! I'll get someone to spell check this form, and then its going live.
Just tell me if you want edit access to the spreadsheet collecting the
answers or the form itself
--
V
Them questions of mine were only suggestions, im cool with deciding not to
use some of them,
Do you really want a link to the shop of 100 PC's, or more? Or did you want
to know if the computer was pre made or not?
I was not being clear, I was thinking a link to the actual pc bought, that
normaly
Do you really want a link to the shop of 100 PC's, or more? Or did you want
to know if the computer was pre made or not?
I think we can take it for granted that native effects and instruments is
used, but if you want we can ask to what extent a LMMS song consists of
external stuff?
> 6. sound eff
A survey on the program is a bit suggestive that we may shift our resources
based on popularity of a particular feature.
Maybe we should consider it, at least knowing what our users want has got
to be a good thing.
Furthermore, long surveys are tremendously annoying to me.
Agreed. Im am more i
some suggestions
If pre made, link to machine in shop/manufactures website
cpu type/ cores / speed
Memory
OS
32/64 bit
Soundcard
Audio backend
speakers
If plugins are used what type VST, LADSPA
Are native instruments and effects used.
Are fx channels used on the mixer.
How would you describe the
Ive only just seen this, I was suggesting simular in issue#1662 Pops and
clicks. but here is a far better place for this discussion. I will come up
with some suggestions for questions :)
On 1 February 2015 at 13:49, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> I thinking about holding a survey to get data about t
I thinking about holding a survey to get data about the LMMS community.
Originally it was just to see how we perform on social media, but when we
conducting a survey, why not ask questions about the program too?
So, devs, what do you want to know about the users and how they use LMMS?
--
View t
13 matches
Mail list logo
