Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Help

2021-03-16 Thread Lukas W.
Hi James, great to hear you want to help! :) This mailing list is pretty much dead nowadays, I'm not sure why the website still refers to it. Most communication is on Discord, you'll have more success reaching out there: https://lmms.io/chat/ - Lukas Am Di., 16. März 2021 um 06:58 Uhr schrieb

[LMMS-devel] Documentation Help

2021-03-15 Thread James Kendrick
Hello, I am an aspiring technical writer, and a user of LMMS. I want to get involved in helping with the LMMS documentation to improve my tech writing portfolio. I have previous professional writing/editing experience and am a student in a university tech comms program. I use LMMS with mostly fr

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation

2018-02-27 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Uros replied to your first email 7 days ago. Did you get it? - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Jeb wrote: > To whom it may concern, > > I would like to help develop LMMS's documentation. May I have an account > made for such purpose on the wiki? > > Sincerely, > Ano

[LMMS-devel] Documentation

2018-02-27 Thread Jeb
To whom it may concern, I would like to help develop LMMS's documentation. May I have an account made for such purpose on the wiki? Sincerely, Anonymouqs[Jehbar Niño Doblas Ibarra] -- Check out the vibrant tech community

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation

2014-12-13 Thread Stian Jørgensrud
And if you want to have access to the wiki just ask. It looks like this on our home page https://lmms.io/documentation/ but is really just MediaWiki https://lmms.io/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Documenta

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation

2014-12-13 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > Hi Tres > I would like to start off by helping Narayan if that is ok? I have just > read through https://github.com/LMMS/lmms.io/issues/99 and will keep > myself up to date with that thread. > I am new to C++ code so will learn that as i go. I want to try making a > vst or two in the future so

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation

2014-12-13 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
@Adam, Hi! As far as documentation: - Stian, Uros and Evan will be able to get you involved/helping with the User Wiki side of things per https://github.com/LMMS/lmms.io/issues/99 - I'd be happy to help you get started with the Developer Wiki side of things. - Narayan is the sole a

[LMMS-devel] Documentation

2014-12-13 Thread Adam
Hello I have been using LMMS for some time now and it is a fantastic DAW. I would like to offer my help with the project by offering help with documentation. I also have basic knowledge of html and css coding so if i can help in any way then i will be happy to do so. I would like to play my p

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-31 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I think integration of this would be easier if you forked the main repo and filed then a pull request. On Friday, January 31, 2014 11:25:37 AM Raine M. Ekman wrote: > Citerar johanne...@mailueberfall.de: > > * Let's make a doc directory in the root, where cmake (or an > > > > additional Makefil

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> We could make this what we could call an easy hack. Meaning for someone > thats new to the code base to familiarize themselves. Yes, perhaps some "summer of code" interns, if such newbies exist out in the world.. :) -Tres

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
We could make this what we could call an easy hack. Meaning for someone thats new to the code base to familiarize themselves. On Wednesday 29 January 2014 10:07:51 Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > @Jonathan, I'm familiar. > > I was simply trying to illustrate that code commenting is a "pay it > forwa

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
@Jonathan, I'm familiar. I was simply trying to illustrate that code commenting is a "pay it forward, moving forward" mentality. To scrape through thousands of lines of code and fix this may not be achievable. IMO it's like filing a bug to name GIMP layers properly. It's more of a standard than

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread Johannes Lorenz
Am Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2014, 15:50:20 schrieb Jonathan Aquilina: > This can discussed on the issue filed. As Long as it is in the tracker it > doesnt matter how long this will take at least we can set a milestone for it > plus also provide any updates of work done, by yourself as well as others O

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Tres what Johannes is saying is documenting the code in the form of inline code comments as to what blocks of code do. On Wednesday 29 January 2014 09:44:22 Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > I can, but I guess this might need to be discussed, and moreover, it is > > not a task that you can finish for t

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
This can discussed on the issue filed. As Long as it is in the tracker it doesnt matter how long this will take at least we can set a milestone for it plus also provide any updates of work done, by yourself as well as others On Wednesday 29 January 2014 15:37:13 Johannes Lorenz wrote: > Am Mitt

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > I can, but I guess this might need to be discussed, and moreover, it is > not a task that you can finish for the next (or any) release. Are you > sure? > Agreed. Documenting code is a standard, a practice or perhaps a culture but isn't a task. A task may be to establish better coding guideli

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread Johannes Lorenz
Am Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2014, 15:15:06 schrieb Jonathan Aquilina: > Can you file a ticket on our github issue tracker for this please. I can, but I guess this might need to be discussed, and moreover, it is not a task that you can finish for the next (or any) release. Are you sure? -

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread Vesa
On 01/29/2014 04:13 PM, johanne...@mailueberfall.de wrote: > Those are imo needed. > > I often see header files with large classes and not a single comment. Not > even a comment what the class is doing, and almost all public functions are > not documented. I mean, a comment like "This gets x" on

[LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread johannes89
Those are imo needed. I often see header files with large classes and not a single comment. Not even a comment what the class is doing, and almost all public functions are not documented. I mean, a comment like "This gets x" on a function named "int get_x() { return x }" is not necessary, but t

Re: [LMMS-devel] Documentation Guidelines

2014-01-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Can you file a ticket on our github issue tracker for this please. On Wednesday 29 January 2014 15:13:43 johanne...@mailueberfall.de wrote: > Those are imo needed. > > I often see header files with large classes and not a single comment. Not > even a comment what the class is doing, and almost al