Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 falsely marekd 1.1.0 in KX Studio repos?

2015-01-06 Thread Vesa
On 01/06/2015 03:35 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > @musikBear, > > Same symptom, different OS. Unfa's talking about KXStudio, which in > contrast to openSUSE, DOES have a maintainer actively part of our > project and which we do recommend most Ubuntu derivatives to install > from for the latest ver

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 falsely marekd 1.1.0 in KX Studio repos?

2015-01-06 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
@musikBear, Same symptom, different OS. Unfa's talking about KXStudio, which in contrast to openSUSE, DOES have a maintainer actively part of our project and which we do recommend most Ubuntu derivatives to install from for the latest version. On the contrary, we don't have anyone from SUSE or o

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 falsely marekd 1.1.0 in KX Studio repos?

2015-01-06 Thread musikbear
already rejected by tresf: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/1547 -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-0-1-falsely-marekd-1-1-0-in-KX-Studio-repos-tp11376p11379.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 falsely marekd 1.1.0 in KX Studio repos?

2015-01-05 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Just let him know. It's mostly cosmetic really and he can provide an update at his leisure which corrects it. - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > Hey, I can't really believe this, but seems like I'm not mistaken. > > I've just updated LMMS to ver

[LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 falsely marekd 1.1.0 in KX Studio repos?

2015-01-05 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
Hey, I can't really believe this, but seems like I'm not mistaken. I've just updated LMMS to version *1.1.0* from KX Studio repos, and when I run it I see... good old version number *1.0.100* Please let me know if your experience confirms this and should we report this issue to Falk TX or whoeve

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-05-05 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
@Toby, Turns out this same bug was preventing SWH from loading on Apple. Here's a screenshot of Butterworth plugins listing on Apple after applying the same __init() style patch. http://i.imgur.com/Tig1o2j.png Is there any chance you can work your magic on the SWH directory? (preferably after c

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-05-01 Thread Tobias Doerffel
2014-05-01 13:44 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud : > WAIIT! > > All tap plugins don't load when opening songs. Try unfa - Spoken. Issue has been fixed - thanks for reporting! Any other critical issues/regressions? Please tell me ASAP so I can address them before 1.0.2. Otherwise I'm going to release 1.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-05-01 Thread Vesa
On 05/02/2014 12:23 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi, > > yes commit 5b29142c284c68d3a7e56c007ec0517f8f941391 which actually is > supposed to fix a crash (on Linux I guess) breaks plugin instantiation > on Win32/Win64. I hope we can come up with a solution soon so we can > release 1.0.2 as a hotfix.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-05-01 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, yes commit 5b29142c284c68d3a7e56c007ec0517f8f941391 which actually is supposed to fix a crash (on Linux I guess) breaks plugin instantiation on Win32/Win64. I hope we can come up with a solution soon so we can release 1.0.2 as a hotfix. @Vesa: any idea? Toby

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-05-01 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Stian is speaking on behalf of the Windows build. Seems to also affect 64-bit win. -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-05-01 Thread Stian Jørgensrud
WAIIT! All tap plugins don't load when opening songs. Try unfa - Spoken. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-0-1-tp8513p8528.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-05-01 Thread Tobias Doerffel
2014-05-01 2:05 GMT+02:00 Israel : > Here is the pending merge into utopic > https://code.launchpad.net/~israeldahl/ubuntu/utopic/lmms/lmms_1.0.1/+merge/217857 Thank you very much! Hopefully 1.0.1 will get in soon and also be backported to trusty. I also fixed the problem with finding WINE on amd6

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Israel
On 04/30/2014 09:15 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi, > > it's a good chance for the SRU as Israel (or whoever ;-) can use the > official 1.0.1 source tarball without having the versioning issues > with 1.0.0. However I don't know when things will be ready. IMHO you > can still post it on FB in the

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Johannes Lorenz
> Anyway I tried it on a non-LADSPA knob - the setLogarithmic function in > automatablemodel - and it doesn't seem to have any effect... You probably mean AutomatableModel::setScaleLogarithmic(bool) ? This is actually the way it should be done when it's not handled by LADSPA. You won't see much

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Johannes Lorenz
> > Were there any problems with the patch, or did you turn it off for some > > reason? > > No, I didn't change anything. Ouch, I was in an old fork of lmms. It works, and the model linking works fine aswell. Only the automation editor displays the frequency still linear now (below the mouse cu

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Vesa
On 04/30/2014 11:40 PM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: >> No you're misunderstanding me. The knob itself can't "guess" it, we'd >> need code in whatever code is using the knob to define the knob as a >> "logarithmic" knob. LADSPA plugin has code for "guessing" when a knob is >> logarithmic, but the LADSPA

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Johannes Lorenz
> No you're misunderstanding me. The knob itself can't "guess" it, we'd > need code in whatever code is using the knob to define the knob as a > "logarithmic" knob. LADSPA plugin has code for "guessing" when a knob is > logarithmic, but the LADSPA plugin host itself would then need to define > thos

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, 2014-04-30 20:10 GMT+02:00 Johannes Lorenz : > Were there any problems with the patch, or did you turn it off for some > reason? No, I didn't change anything. Toby -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Brow

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Johannes Lorenz
> > I tried the current master branch today, but the logscale behaviour does > > not seem to be working (it's still linear). Though the patch's code is > > actually in. > > Doesn't it need to be turned on in the individual knobs? I don't think > it should make all the knobs everywhere logarithmic.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Vesa
On 04/30/2014 09:10 PM, Johannes Lorenz wrote: > Hi, > >> LMMS 1.0.1 just has been released > Thanks first of all! > > I tried the current master branch today, but the logscale behaviour does not > seem to be working (it's still linear). Though the patch's code is actually > in. Doesn't it need

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Johannes Lorenz
Hi, > LMMS 1.0.1 just has been released Thanks first of all! I tried the current master branch today, but the logscale behaviour does not seem to be working (it's still linear). Though the patch's code is actually in. Were there any problems with the patch, or did you turn it off for some rea

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, it's a good chance for the SRU as Israel (or whoever ;-) can use the official 1.0.1 source tarball without having the versioning issues with 1.0.0. However I don't know when things will be ready. IMHO you can still post it on FB in the meanwhile. Thanks Toby

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Stian Jørgensrud
Will Ubuntu have to wait a long time on this one too? I feel bad when posting to FB that a new version is out, but not for Ubuntu :/ -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-0-1-tp8513p8515.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archiv

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Stian Jørgensrud
Well that's freaking surprising -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-0-1-tp8513p8514.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- "Acc

[LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-04-30 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, LMMS 1.0.1 just has been released - see https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/releases/tag/v1.0.1 for details. Files can be downloaded at https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmms/files/lmms/1.0.1/ Toby -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-24 Thread Israel
On 04/23/2014 09:43 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Stian Jørgensrud > wrote: > > Wait. Shall I post all those different ppa's to facebook > > Yes. > > > or just that you can download the latest LMMS through software center? > > P

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-23 Thread Israel
On 04/23/2014 09:23 AM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > Wait. Shall I post all those different ppa's to facebook or just that you can > download the latest LMMS through software center? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-0-1-ubunt

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-23 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > Wait. Shall I post all those different ppa's to facebook Yes. or just that you can download the latest LMMS through software center? > Please Advise 14.04 distro users NOT to use the software center version. This would be any Linux ve

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-23 Thread Stian Jørgensrud
Wait. Shall I post all those different ppa's to facebook or just that you can download the latest LMMS through software center? -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-0-1-ubuntu-tp8053p8279.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list arch

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Here is the PPA that I tested with (pasted below). Note, I only tested 14.04 32-bit as that is what was instructed as priority. Israel will be able to speak better to the longevity of these ppas. -Tres > *14.04 (32-bit and 64-bit)*deb > http://ppa.launchpad.net/israeldahl/lmms-1.0.1/ubuntu tr

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
@Israel, Make sure you keep in contact with timo. As he seems to be very willing to mentor and help you as well as us get this sorted. On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Israel wrote: > On 04/20/2014 12:20 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > What about the new one in israels ppa? Any chance we can

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I would say yes. at least at that point we would have people on the right package, and then can work on the SRU On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > As soon as you provide the ppa, should I post it on the FB page? People are > asking, naturally > > > > -- > View this messa

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Stian Jørgensrud
As soon as you provide the ppa, should I post it on the FB page? People are asking, naturally -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-0-1-ubuntu-tp8053p8155.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Israel
On 04/20/2014 02:25 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > I have tested and would recommend Israel's 1.0.1 for the interim. > > 1.0.1 reported no bugs and worked both with and without wine. > > I'm not at a computer now to post the PPA, but that's the one I'd > recommend until a proper SRU is accepted.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
I have tested and would recommend Israel's 1.0.1 for the interim. 1.0.1 reported no bugs and worked both with and without wine. I'm not at a computer now to post the PPA, but that's the one I'd recommend until a proper SRU is accepted. -

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Israel
On 04/20/2014 12:20 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: What about the new one in israels ppa? Any chance we can get the sru ready by tomorrow or Tuesday at the latest. On 20 Apr 2014 19:09, "Vesa" mailto:dii@nbl.fi>> wrote: We really need to solve this fast. Apparently, both the KXS

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Vesa
On 04/20/2014 09:23 PM, Filipe Coelho wrote: > I haven't heard of a single issue with KXStudio packages in 14.04 (it > uses 1.0.0 btw), > apart from the double-notes thing as reported by Luigi. I've heard of problems on at least two occasions, both were on 14.04 and using the KXStudio PPA. It cou

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Filipe Coelho
On 04/20/2014 06:09 PM, Vesa wrote: We really need to solve this fast. Apparently, both the KXStudio package and the official package have problems in 14.04, neither seems to be working properly in 14.04. I haven't heard of a single issue with KXStudio packages in 14.04 (it uses 1.0.0 btw), ap

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
What about the new one in israels ppa? Any chance we can get the sru ready by tomorrow or Tuesday at the latest. On 20 Apr 2014 19:09, "Vesa" wrote: > We really need to solve this fast. > > Apparently, both the KXStudio package and the official package have > problems in 14.04, neither seems to b

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Vesa
We really need to solve this fast. Apparently, both the KXStudio package and the official package have problems in 14.04, neither seems to be working properly in 14.04. We need to have at least one binary package that is usable in 14.04. Something that we can recommend to users when they show up

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Israel
On 04/20/2014 03:40 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: we have to file an SRU. I have not heard anything from Israel. Those bugs should mention we are working on getting an updated version into 14.04 On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Vesa > wrote: What's going on with t

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
we have to file an SRU. I have not heard anything from Israel. Those bugs should mention we are working on getting an updated version into 14.04 On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Vesa wrote: > What's going on with this? How is the package replacement progressing? > > We're already getting bugre

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-20 Thread Vesa
What's going on with this? How is the package replacement progressing? We're already getting bugreports from people using the broken package. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-17 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
You clearly did not read my email thoroughly. Testing results 14.04 x86: > ... > - VST Support Audio + GUI - PASS > ... Furthermore our demos are prohibited from shipping with plugins that aren't part of the source code, hence, no, not VST. -Tres

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-17 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
are you running it on 64bit by any chance could it be that its missing some vst plugins? On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > wrote: > >> Did you test any other demo songs? Did others work? >> > > I tested 5 demo songs with no issues. > --

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-17 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
wrote: > Did you test any other demo songs? Did others work? > I tested 5 demo songs with no issues. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-17 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
You need to do it as you are the package maintainer. He is just providing a guiding hand. On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Israel wrote: > On 04/16/2014 02:21 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > @Israel disregard my last email. I linked to the merge proposal by timo on > the bug and I think once

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Did you test any other demo songs? Did others work? On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Testing results 14.04 x86: > > (basic functionality testing) > - PPA testing to verify it grabs 1.0.1 with Universe enabled - PASS > - Unity menu work-arou

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-16 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Testing results 14.04 x86: (basic functionality testing) - PPA testing to verify it grabs 1.0.1 with Universe enabled - PASS - Unity menu work-around (KDE menu/MDI controls fix) - PASS - Mimetype icon + Association - PASS - ZynAddSubFX Audio + GUI - PASS - VST Support Audio + GUI - PASS - Other in

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-16 Thread Israel
On 04/16/2014 02:21 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: @Israel disregard my last email. I linked to the merge proposal by timo on the bug and I think once that is sorted we are good to go as well as a feature freeze exception is filed for MOTU sponsorship then we should be good to go hopefully. On

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
@Israel disregard my last email. I linked to the merge proposal by timo on the bug and I think once that is sorted we are good to go as well as a feature freeze exception is filed for MOTU sponsorship then we should be good to go hopefully. On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Disregard my last email it seems like Timo is working on this On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Was it? Can you please provide a snippet? I don't recall and can't > locate it. > -- Jonathan Aquilina

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
@Israel, 2 things 1) an ubuntu studio dev mentioned the following for a MOTU to be able to review the upload, he needs to be able to verify the upstream tarball so knowing that commit is the most important thing. archive admins would probably also reject a "1.0.1" when there's no such upstream

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
He actually created a bug My blood froze, when LMMS didn't prompt me to recover the project after it crashed. Thank God I was able to reproduce all changes by memory (I can't believe I made it!). I now made a test (made few changesto the project, left LMMS for a few minutes and killed it the rela

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Was it? Can you please provide a snippet? I don't recall and can't locate it. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications.

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
it was on the bastardized 1.0 thread. On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Which email about auto save? > -- Jonathan Aquilina -- Learn Graph Databases - Download F

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I think at this point if its as it should be we should get this put in asap. we could always provide backport and or updates via a ppa. I think vesa was also going to do some testing. I honestly think from all the positive things I have read via email that we should not delay this any longer as th

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Which email about auto save? -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, t

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
They have not gotten a hold of it but are aware of it. I think we should move forward with this. My question though is in the email unfa sent about the auto save. Is that as it should be? Is it something that one has to enable as its not enabled by default? On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Israel

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Is tomorrow evening too late for testing? I agree with the points mentioned and in a way I'm sort of relieved Vesa was cool with the 1.0.1 numbering on this build as it gets us closer to our goal. -Tres -- Learn Graph Dat

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Israel
On 04/15/2014 09:50 AM, Vesa wrote: On 04/15/2014 04:55 PM, Israel wrote: Well... anyhow this installs just fine on my computer from the software center once I added in the repo. if anyone wants to test it they are more than welcome to. can the stable branch freeze as is so it can match this wh

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Israel
On 04/15/2014 09:50 AM, Vesa wrote: On 04/15/2014 04:55 PM, Israel wrote: Well... anyhow this installs just fine on my computer from the software center once I added in the repo. if anyone wants to test it they are more than welcome to. can the stable branch freeze as is so it can match this wh

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Vesa
On 04/15/2014 04:55 PM, Israel wrote: > Well... anyhow this installs just fine on my computer from the > software center once I added in the repo. > if anyone wants to test it they are more than welcome to. > can the stable branch freeze as is so it can match this when it is > released as 1.0.1? o

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Thanks (about X11). I didn't even think that the parent directory could be a symlink. I thought the version that will come out next will be 1.1.0 how do stable > release updates get numbered? If someone wants to get the source code of your 1.0.1 build, where would they download it from? 1.0.0-s

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Israel
Well... anyhow this installs just fine on my computer from the software center once I added in the repo. if anyone wants to test it they are more than welcome to. can the stable branch freeze as is so it can match this when it is released as 1.0.1? otherwise you will have to wait until tonight

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
1.1.0 is due for release in june this would be 1.0.0 still the 1.0.1 release will be when toby gets back as we have nobody else who can package for windows. On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Israel wrote: > > > On 04/15/2014 08:14 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > I can test, but what has changed

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Israel
On 04/15/2014 08:14 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: I can test, but what has changed? Simply saying "try this new PPA" doesn't really help me un when the PPA is built you can test the non-frankenstein package... sorry I was chatting with Jonathan and in the 'you know what I am already talking

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I agree with the numbering though as tres mentioned below we should do something like 1.0.0-new as using 1.0.1 will cause bit of confusion in terms of bugs as well as users of other platforms. On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Vesa wrote: > On 04/15/2014 04:14 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > I

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Vesa
On 04/15/2014 04:14 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > I can test, but what has changed? Simply saying "try this new PPA" > doesn't really help me understand what I'm looking for... > > > I hope the package name is ok for all here > > You should do 1.0.0-new or 1.0.0-test2, etc. 1.0.1 represents a >

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Typo: *Usually the terminal will illustrate a symlink. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaim

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
I can test, but what has changed? Simply saying "try this new PPA" doesn't really help me understand what I'm looking for... > I hope the package name is ok for all here You should do 1.0.0-new or 1.0.0-test2, etc. 1.0.1 represents a future number and will be quite confusing. > @Tres X11 is a

[LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1 ubuntu

2014-04-15 Thread Israel
I hope the package name is ok for all here *ppa:israeldahl/lmms-1.0.1 *test this one. @Tres X11 is a symlink, so the actual binary is the same... the directory X11 points back to /usr/bin so there is only one file -- Regards -

Re: [LMMS-devel] lmms 1.0.1 bug fix release

2014-04-06 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, So far we got only very few fixes since 1.0: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/commits/stable-1.0 It's mainly the OS X stuff, coding style improvements/cleanups and other compat stuff. The only thing I'd consider critical are the CAPS fixes (https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/commit/5b29142c284c68d3a7

Re: [LMMS-devel] lmms 1.0.1 bug fix release

2014-04-05 Thread Vesa
On 04/05/2014 07:59 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Nothing mentioned yet, hence this email. I think for bug fix releases > we should release often, even I would say some experimental features > that way for the next major release 1.1 we can have those features > stabilized No, bugfix releases shou

Re: [LMMS-devel] lmms 1.0.1 bug fix release

2014-04-05 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Nothing mentioned yet, hence this email. I think for bug fix releases we should release often, even I would say some experimental features that way for the next major release 1.1 we can have those features stabilized On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Hannu Haahti wrote: > That's right. I misread

Re: [LMMS-devel] lmms 1.0.1 bug fix release

2014-04-05 Thread Hannu Haahti
That's right. I misread. Is 1.0.1 out already, or going to be? 2014-04-05 18:01 GMT+03:00 Jonathan Aquilina : > That was the 1.0.0 changelog I thought? > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Hannu Haahti wrote: > >> Toby already sent a (tentative?) changelog on this list a while back. >> >> >>

Re: [LMMS-devel] lmms 1.0.1 bug fix release

2014-04-05 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
That was the 1.0.0 changelog I thought? On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Hannu Haahti wrote: > Toby already sent a (tentative?) changelog on this list a while back. > > > 2014-04-05 9:12 GMT+03:00 Jonathan Aquilina : > >> Hey Toby and everyone, >> >> Have there been alot of bugs which have been

Re: [LMMS-devel] lmms 1.0.1 bug fix release

2014-04-05 Thread Hannu Haahti
Toby already sent a (tentative?) changelog on this list a while back. 2014-04-05 9:12 GMT+03:00 Jonathan Aquilina : > Hey Toby and everyone, > > Have there been alot of bugs which have been fixed since the release of > 1.0? > > -- > Jonathan Aquilina > > > ---

[LMMS-devel] lmms 1.0.1 bug fix release

2014-04-04 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Hey Toby and everyone, Have there been alot of bugs which have been fixed since the release of 1.0? -- Jonathan Aquilina -- ___ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourcef